If it's real, it's pretty clear to anyone who reads your posts that you either have zero knowledge of transportation, engineering, and budgets or that you come from an alternate dimension where the laws of physics and economy are completely different.

If it's real, would you consider going to college to study these matters for a few years before posting about it again? You clearly have an interest in the matter but have no actual knowledge or realistic conception of how any of it works, but this could be solved by a degree or two.

If it's a prank I've got to hand it to you, I appreciate the commitment.

D_Empire412 OP t1_j5rzwdi wrote on January 25, 2023 at 3:37 AM

I believe this can really be done.

4th-Ale-Or-Lingas t1_j5ttre8 wrote on January 25, 2023 at 3:03 PM

That's because you have no knowledge or experience.

D_Empire412 OP t1_j5ty7kh wrote on January 25, 2023 at 3:32 PM

I still believe a pedestrian tunnel should be built. All the money that would've been spent on 2WTC should be instead spent on a tunnel.

4th-Ale-Or-Lingas t1_j5vnhvx wrote on January 25, 2023 at 9:49 PM

I'm not trolling you when I say you might consider studying these subjects in college. I saw another comment that you're a teenager. You clearly have a lot of interest in this sort of thing, but I hate to tell you the notions you're proposing are so unrealistic as to essentially be science fiction. A pedestrian tunnel is extraordinarily implausible and is not something that would ever happen. Study these things for a few years though and you might come up with some genuine ideas, but I think you'll find your old posts here a bit embarrassing. (All adults are embarrassed by their teenage antics, so don't worry about that.)

D_Empire412 OP t1_j5vs5pc wrote on January 25, 2023 at 10:18 PM

I like getting the downvotes. It's amusing.