Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

kushNation141 t1_j1hidiv wrote

no what we need is stricter penalties for pieces of sh!t who break the law, especially using violence. $#@! 3 strikes and all that hand holding BS.

23

RollinRibs25 t1_j1iwfvd wrote

Its also already a felony to assault an nj transit employee if thats not stopping them then your dumbass argument is invalid.

9

kushNation141 t1_j1j0oew wrote

yea and it goes to court and they get off on some sort of technicality or some BS about first time offense.

2

RollinRibs25 t1_j1j2fgc wrote

Its called conditional discharge. You should probably read up some before you go spewing out of your closet consertative ass.

−8

kushNation141 t1_j1j8dpp wrote

very far from any part of politics let alone a conservative. but also not some sucker liberal who falls for everything as things crumble around them.

4

SyndicalistCPA t1_j1i7lbh wrote

Stricter penalties doesn't prevent crime. Access to social welfare, education, opportunities, and actual rehabilitation prevents crime.

2

kushNation141 t1_j1iuevm wrote

thats the logic that has us where we are now. They tried being lenient. and this is the end result, and next generation will be even more ignorant and violent.....But keep playing social expeirments

5

SyndicalistCPA t1_j1nim9c wrote

Where have they tried being lenient? Where has rehabilitation been tried here? Social safety nets have been eroded since Reagan. What are you even talking about?

1

RollinRibs25 t1_j1iw5of wrote

Kush nation wants stronger penalties, okay officer smokey

−6