Submitted by hourlongflyer t3_zuduvn in jerseycity

Has anyone switched from a car life to non-car life or vice versa? What are your experiences?

We live in downtown JC right above grove st station. We are used to life with a car since we moved here from CA. With the economic downturn, me and my gf have been working more hours than usual. We’ve been utilizing the car less and less. The car basically just sits there 90% of the days and we only use it 1-2 times a week for groceries and recreation

With depreciation and everything we spend around 15k on this car (bought with cash, insurance, parking, gas, and maintenance) We make around 110k after tax and rent.

We are thinking we could use Avis/Turo for weekend trips, and Uber/transit for everything else. We might start using online groceries. We used to visit Costco/Trader Joe's and 99 ranch once per week.

Why we wanted to sell:

  1. Very low utilization, car sitting there and cost so much money doesn’t make sense.
  2. Used car market is still high.
  3. Hassle of owning it

Why we are hesitant:

  1. We had a car since college, not sure if we will adjust to the new lifestyle
  2. Potential inconvenience, we are not sure how uber/rentals and subway will work out for us
  3. We have a dog. Vet and grooming is in walking distance though

Any suggestions or experiences are appreciated!

24

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

AugustWest7120 t1_j1ii2pw wrote

Sell it now. No insurance needed, don’t have to worry about gas $ anymore!

13

Affectionate-Buy2539 t1_j1ii63n wrote

I'd suggest make a list of everywhere you go during the week and on the weekend and then in the next column list how far each of those places are from where you live. In the third column write in minutes what walking/public transit would take.Live in JC with no car (sometimes get a zipcar for huge pantry restocks/grocery hauls) and it's just fine--but definitely depends on what your key activities are and how easy they are to get to. Like if you would be miserable without it for your 10% of activities, then you need to determine how much of a deal breaker that is (or if it's not actually a deal breaker).

44

mad_dog_94 t1_j1ij4ze wrote

Yep. You don't need a car here. Especially if your whole life is downtown

26

mickyrow42 t1_j1ijepe wrote

why are you including depreciation? The car payment is the car payment -- so what are you paying and is it worth it is the basic question. My car sits most of the time as well -- I put barely 5k miles a year on it, but my all in payment is nominal against the convenience it provides. I'm the type that needs freedom from having to schedule my coming and going. If you don't mind hurdles every time you need to do something beyond walking distance, then get rid of it.

10

PlentyEquivalent5619 t1_j1ilvxg wrote

You don’t qualify your statements so no one can give you real advice. Your leave 1-2 times…a week/month/year? You currently spend $15k on a car you paid cash for? You’re paying for deprecation?

Regardless, having a dog it’s helps when you need to go to the vet or if you have an emergency. To me the best part about living here is leaving on the weekends, but it sounds like your priorities are different than mine.

−7

Jahooodie t1_j1inf25 wrote

If you do sell the car you may want to keep a driver only policy. I went car less for a few years, and my rates coming back to owning a car were about 2.5x (even with worse coverage & deductible) what they were before. The insurance person gave me the reason was lapse in coverage made them rate me back down with new driver/insurance scofflaw policies, and that keeping a low basic driver only policy would have helped with that. Maybe blowing smoke at me, but fuck no one told me about the possible downsides

12

mmarkDC t1_j1io8mr wrote

I don't find a car necessary in downtown. I don't have a dog though.

I do a mixture of Amazon Fresh, Amazon subscription, and Target delivery for grocery staples. For last-minute or stuff where I want to pick it out there are enough walkable places (Oliva, Key Foods), which aren't cheap but fine if you're not stocking up. I guess you can walk to ShopRite too. Super Buy Rite has free local delivery for beer/wine/liquor and good prices.

A lot of it comes down to whether you want/need to be in suburban NJ frequently. Car rental is fine for a weekend trip now and then, but probably not if you're visiting your parents in Morristown every weekend. A lot of the people without cars have social lives more oriented around either JC itself, or JC+NYC.

11

Ilanaspax t1_j1ioqly wrote

Its feasible but relying on public transit and Ubers for everything outside of downtown will add up quickly and more importantly be a time suck. Jersey city isn’t like Manhattan where public transit actually ends up being faster than driving - it just makes running errands longer and more miserable. It also drastically limits your ability to do outdoor activities that would otherwise be super accessible with a car - beach, hiking, skiing, etc. If you’re fine with being stuck in downtown JC and don’t do anything else it’s manageable.

6

mqk659 t1_j1itcv0 wrote

Try renting it out on Turo?

5

JeromePowellAdmirer t1_j1ithnq wrote

Train to South Mountain or Harriman or Asbury/Long Branch or Coney Island or Long Beach NY or Jones Beach NY. Enough to scratch the itch a couple times a month, can even rent a car for another weekend on top of that and still come out ahead. Having 2 people in the car does make their math work better. Skiing, that would indeed be tougher, but I wouldn't live in Jersey City if skiing was a big part of my life, unless I had tons of disposable income (it does seem these people do have tons of disposable income)

9

jcdevel t1_j1iw8xb wrote

"We are thinking we could use Avis/Turo for weekend trips, " .

Just think of the hassle of choosing a car, hoping the rates are not high on the particular weekend you want to take, having to deal with with Customer service representative trying to upsell you all kinds of insurance service , inspecting the car to make sure they don't blame you for any existing dings etc, etc and compare that to just getting in your car and just driving off ...

Also as other's have said, not sure if just it's a good idea to include depreciation cost unless your sole purpose is reach some kind of financial goal post to the detriment of everything else.

2

fuzedz t1_j1iyfj3 wrote

Tbh not having a car wjen you need one suuuucks and grocery shopping without one sucks too

4

WingardiumLeviYoAss t1_j1j4cca wrote

There’s 4 zip cars in the garage right next you (160 Morgan) that are used a lot! I have a car but only because I can’t get to work by public transit. I order my weekly groceries through Amazon but get cold cuts and stuff from Sprove.

I’d check how much a month you’d be spending on ordering groceries/Ubers first and compare that cost to your monthly car costs!

2

Little-Profit2681 t1_j1j4eqt wrote

We used to be in the same situation as you. Had a car, moved to DTJC near the PATH and found ourselves using it way less than before.

Between the car payment, parking and insurance I realized that it was way cheaper to take Ubers and Public transport to places. For Costco we can take the light rail to Bayonne and an Uber for $20 back.

I ended up selling the car 3 weeks ago and I honestly don’t even remember I had a car lmao

7

ribasad t1_j1j4tzb wrote

You could look into making your car available for rent on Turo. It would monetize the days you’re not using your car

3

itsfleric t1_j1j74y0 wrote

Yup, when I sold my car Progressive walked me through the scenario and offered non-owners insurance for pretty cheap. It's something you usually have to call them to access the policy because they're not generally available online. It also covers you if you borrow someone else's car and if you get injured in a car-related accident and rental cars.

3

bobroberts12345 t1_j1j7h21 wrote

I've been car free since moving to JC and I save a lot of time and money not owning a car. I have an e-bike and I'm in the process of buying a trailer to haul larger amounts of groceries, etc. It's great for around town trips and i use transit during bad weather or for longer trips. I've rented a car in the past with getaround for longer trips.

7

mushroomsandroses t1_j1j8rtz wrote

How's your stamina, and how much are you bringing back on the 99 Ranch grocery runs? I make the trip there pretty regularly from the Heights with no car, and you're way closer to it than I am. For me, the big downside is that light rail service absolutely sucks on weekends--plus, there's dragging your groceries up the steps from Hoboken--but at under a mile away, you probably don't need it. I will say that using a rolling shopping bag makes a big difference.

They also deliver, though you do have to deal with delivery fees and tips then.

8

RealFunBobby t1_j1jcda8 wrote

We moved from CA a few years ago and kept our car. The only time we use the car is during the weekends for hikes and trips that are inaccessible by the public transit. Everything else is either accessible by walk, public transit, uber, or delivery.

6

wavybbq t1_j1jfuj2 wrote

Whatever you do, don’t use GetAround

1

PICHICONCACA t1_j1jjap8 wrote

There this growing wave of anti car people in the USA. Truth is, a car is such an incredible tool. Like anything else in the world, you need tools to match your lifestyle.

I’ll never trust a stranger to buy my groceries.

And I have my personal feelings on the shared economy….

Giving up my car is not in the cards for me.

1

Ilanaspax t1_j1jkc95 wrote

Ah yes who doesn’t love soaking up the sun at the beach or going on a long hike and then ubering(if you can find a car) back to the train station that runs on a tight schedule, and then riding the train for an hour and then waiting for the path and/or lightrail while lugging all your beach gear?😍

Sounds like a fun and relaxing day! I bet it’s even more of a blast on weekends when the schedule sucks.

−2

jcnative t1_j1jllss wrote

You're perfectly allowed to sell the car then buy back again in the summer or next year. Me personally I think its worth having a car for the few trips away but I dont pay for parking.

8

khiladi- t1_j1jmog0 wrote

We've been in Jersey City car free for three years and are now thinking of getting our first car. Reasons why we are getting it:

  • Can buy more per grocery run
  • Can go to further away grocery shops
  • Can leave things like car seat in the car
  • Can explore the rest of NJ and NY. Honestly exploring without a car is a real pain. I haven't been for a single hike.
6

DavidPuddy666 t1_j1jna4l wrote

Getting bikes might make the transition to car free life a little easier, and also save on the Uber budget. Jersey City has a growing network of bike lanes - biking has become safer and easier every year since I moved here.

10

Jahooodie t1_j1jplsw wrote

No one offered this to me or let me know it was a thing, so happy to bring it up. It was a nice few years with no car or driving, but holy hell does it suck to have a very high deductible & monthly rates higher than 22 year olds

6

mookybelltolls t1_j1jqd5f wrote

Yes yes yes. This is how we live now. My car was stolen and it took an ENORMOUS weight off me. You are living here, not the car.

12

TheObliviousPickle t1_j1jv6i5 wrote

I personally love having one for beach trips and the like. Your issue is you bought a car that is wayyyy too expensive. Just downgrade to a civic or accord and you won’t be “paying $10k a year in depreciation”

3

bindrosis t1_j1jxq29 wrote

Now is the time to sell. People are paying more now than ever for cars

1

salajander t1_j1k2he4 wrote

You could probably rent a car from Avis/Hertz/etc. for a weekend 2 or 3 times a month and still be paying less than you are for insurance/maintenance/parking.

Yes, it's a bit extra work to go pick up a rental when you need it, but it's way less stress than worrying about parking or break-ins on unexpected maintenance.

Source: have lived in DTJC since 1995 without a car; had one, but it was broken into twice and then stolen and all we ever used it for was the occasional trip to the shore. No car is muuuuch nicer.

0

Nuplex t1_j1k2rtl wrote

I was going to say yes but (and no one seems to have mentioned this) you have a dog. That would make me hesitant to sell. If you can do everything with dog (vet, parks, increased rental fees) then go ahead. Especially if you are sure you will rarely use the car.

For me I use my car only a few times a month so it's parked far away in a cheap but secure lot. I can't sell as I go out further into NJ and other states enough that itd be too much of an inconvenience. When I dogsat for an extended time I found the car very helpful too.

Ultimately up to you! If you expect to only exist in JC and NYC shouldn't be a problem getting rid of it.

1

Keepitmovingninja t1_j1k34j8 wrote

If you make 110 after tax and rent just keep the car. Convenience counts.

6

pixel_of_moral_decay t1_j1k4785 wrote

Either way is irrelevant. You always pay partially based on usage. That’s always factored in.

But someone who had a period of inactivity is going to be a higher risk. Lapsed insurance or license = higher odds of crashing

−1

JeromePowellAdmirer t1_j1k6q54 wrote

Beach gear? I'm carrying a chair at most and more likely only a blanket. I also don't sunbathe anyways, I walk for 2-3 hours at most. That beats hunting for parking and moving a car 4 times a week when I only use it once a week. Taking transit is also relaxation time unless you believe in the NY Post lunacy about it, unlike driving time. With the money I save I enjoy a better life on the weekdays.

4

hourlongflyer OP t1_j1kao72 wrote

U completely missed the point of this post. The car made perfect sense back in CA since we use it every day. Doesn't matter if it is a 20 or a 70k car. If u really wanted to talk about how much I make and how much I should pay for a car, do it elsewhere. I'm not here to discuss that with you.

2

Yin-Hei t1_j1kd8wj wrote

I see ppl hopping on the light rail and pay nothing for it.

1

objectimpermanence t1_j1kg0eq wrote

I don’t think this is always the case.

I went 3 years without a car and without auto insurance. When I got a car again, I ended up with a pretty reasonable insurance premium.

But I did have to shop around. My previous insurer was State Farm and their quote was significantly higher than what Geico quoted me for the same level of coverage.

Also important to note that rates vary by address/zip code. JC has higher than average insurance rates, so if you live in a different area than you did when you last had a car then that might explain some of the sticker shock.

6

objectimpermanence t1_j1ki0ix wrote

Just sell your car and see what life is like without it for a few months. You can always buy another one, especially since car prices are finally starting moderate.

Personally, I lived here for 3 years without a car before I decided to buy one. I only use my car once or twice a week, but for me it’s worth it to have the ability to leave town spontaneously. It’s definitely more of a luxury than a necessity.

I mainly bought a car because I got into hiking and I found that dealing with rentals got to be really annoying.

The traditional rental car places can be frustrating to deal with. Sometimes the JC Hertz would run out of cars on holiday weekends and ruin my plans even though I had a “reservation.”

Even Zipcar was a hassle because I found that the cars near me were always booked up when I wanted one. And when you do get a Zipcar, you’re constantly looking at the clock and stressing out about returning it on time.

12

flapjack212 t1_j1knk1k wrote

people have given you some decent suggestions but the only other one i'd say is your decision is not final. you can always re-buy your car again in x years if you change your mind, and you'll likely be financially better for for not having owned a car during those x years.

3

Vertigo963 t1_j1krstt wrote

My wife and I use the car to visit family - it's much easier to do that by car than by any other means. Is that a concern?

3

foot-trail t1_j1kxnc3 wrote

I sold my car just about two years ago and have had no regrets except until I recently started seeing someone that lives a distance away. Food? Amazon fresh/local markets/other grocery delivery services for the odd thing (also 99 Ranch is not a bad walk at all with reusable bags at that distance); Uber can get expensive but I've found I spend less on uber than having a car. If you own a car and don't street park, you are likely spending at least $500 per month between parking and insurance. If you do a bunch of weekend trips then I'd say it's maybe worth it to keep the car, but if you're talking once every two or three months then rent.

That said, if you have an SUV feel free to dm me and I might want to take it off your hands to drive to see the GF, which is my biggest issue currently.

5

lindsayylmao t1_j1ky99f wrote

I was in a similar position this summer and I sold mine. It feels like an inconvenience to go without a car after having one, but the monthly parking and insurance payments, + the stress of maintenance on the car is also inconvenient. If you use it more than twice monthly, especially for long distances, it probably makes sense to keep it if you’re willing to pay for the convenience of having a car at your disposal 24/7. If you can go without it for 4 weeks or more, ditch it. It’s a bit of a pain in the ass to coordinate a rental car when I need it but it’s just an adjustment I was willing to make

3

mules-are-half-assed t1_j1l7lxq wrote

So I got rid of mine, and while there are endless benefits and I barely miss it for the most part... I miss my car because that means I can't decide to drive my dog somewhere so he can have enrichment (beach, hiking, dog park, etc) on a whim. I have to ask friends or boyfriend to drive me, which sucks, and I feel like my dog suffers.

4

RogerBuoy t1_j1lfzk8 wrote

Having a car would definitely be convenient if you want to do some impromptu visits around the city to take a break etc. I don’t have a car and during holidays like Christmas etc, Car rentals are sold out and I literally am dependent on my friends who own cars in such times. So if you think you can afford it, I’d say keep it and cut down parking cost, get a low maintenance car or something else if possible. Another problem is that you won’t think twice before going out for silly things when you have car, but in case of rentals, sometimes you might double think on the worth of spending 100-150$ on a day’s car for it. You can still easily survive here without a car, but will need to pre-plan outings, rental car bookings etc.

2

pixel_of_moral_decay t1_j1m13ir wrote

Geico is cheaper because it’s a big step down in insurance. It’s what you get to meet the legal requirements. State Farm is a big step up. There’s more than a chance in hell State Farm may pay out if necessary.

Nothing wrong with Geico. For some people that’s exactly what they want/need. But even if the amounts on the policy are the same, it’s not the same product.

Same with State Farm vs one of the mutual companies like NJM, MET Life, Amica. You get what you pay for. Those are policies for people who expect to get paid out when they have an insurable event.

Comparing policies purely by coverage amounts is like ordering food by total calories. You’re ignoring a lot of the details.

3

ABrusca1105 t1_j1m79z8 wrote

It varies by your driving record and state but I paid $379/year. In 26M with an accident and 1 moving violation 5 years ago. In NJ they told me no new policies but only converted existing policies.

They also ask you how many miles you expect to drive in that time frame. I think I said 500 mi for 6 months or something like that.

Yes, it covers when you rent. I'm pretty sure regular car insurance does as well. That's the point of non-owner insurance basically. It also keeps continuous coverage for you. If you sell your car and you go without insurance, then when you get a new car eventually your insurance will basically be like you went uninsured, but maybe not as bad. I bet this is saving me money in the long run. Especially if I ever rent and insurance is going to be more than that.

If you have a clean driving record and you're in your 30s, 40s or 50s, you would probably be significantly less money than I paid. It was like a quarter of what my real insurance was when I had a car.

3

kevintravels t1_j1m7z5w wrote

Living right next to Path sort of clinches it right there. Shopping online for groceries is awesome. Instead of traveling in a car for weekend trips you’ll just spend more time in the city. The city has more to offer anyway.

I moved from New Jersey into Manhattan. The rent there was a lot more than I had been paying in Jersey. The guy that owned the building I was moving to asked if I’d be able to afford it. I told him my plan was to sell my car. With that I’d be able to take all the money I saved and donate it to some struggling real estate investor. He liked that. He laughed his ass off and I got the apartment.

1

HobokenJ t1_j1mi5ph wrote

It seems like you've made a pretty compelling case on your own re: ditching the car. do it!

As for me: Born and raised in the suburbs, so always lived a very car-centric life (including a stint in the Bay Area). Moved to Hoboken in 2006, and, like you, my car basically sat in the garage all week, with weekend trips to visit family.

Sandy hit, and I lost the car to the flood. Just assumed I'd replace it because... well, because I always had a car! One month goes by, then another. I realize... I don't miss the car at all.

It's now been 10 years, and I still don't miss it (I live DTJC, which isn't quite as convenient as Hoboken re: walkability, but is obviously excellent in this regard).

7

EatMorePi t1_j1muiat wrote

I don’t understand the argument that the cost of the car itself doesn’t matter. In addition to comparing your current car to the cost of Uber/zipcar with no car, you should definitely compare to getting a cheaper car. I make more than you do and bought the lowest price Honda CRV during the pandemic. It was a great decision, and cheaper by far than using Uber and zipcar given how often I use it.

1

Mia07304 t1_j1mwmaz wrote

I switched to Metromile from State Farm in March 2018. I drive under 5,000 miles/yr. I'm fully insured and pay less than 40-50% of what I was paying with SF, & I had a discount with SF for low mileage. I even upped my liability insurance with MM. As for living DT without a car, I did it for 20+ years but eventually the car rentals became a headache. Living uptown it's not as convenient so I like having a car.

2

objectimpermanence t1_j1ngyfg wrote

That’s what I thought too. But my wheels got stolen a month or two after I bought the car and it ended up being close to a $10k claim because of the damage the thieves caused in the process.

I sent the car to the body shop of my choosing and got all OEM replacement parts. I didn’t have any trouble getting Geico to pay out the claim and they didn’t hike my rates after that. So my experience with them has been OK so far.

3

Ilanaspax t1_j1nq67n wrote

Congrats? Most normal people aren’t going to the beach to “walk around for 2-3 hours” with just the clothes on their back. Its relaxing to drive back in air conditioning with room for blankets/umbrellas instead of carrying it on your back while standing in the hot sun covered in sand and waiting for a train that will be followed by atleast 1-2 transfers.

Also NYC beaches are mostly disgusting and I say that with love. They don’t even compare to jersey or Long Island. But that’s what’s nice about having a car- I can have all these options and I’m not limited to dirty beaches or whatever hikes are near a train station. It allows me to have a great quality of life 7 days a week 🥰

1

hourlongflyer OP t1_j1nqq3r wrote

I also don’t understand why people are so obsessed with how much my car cost. I don’t need personal finance advise from you. If u make more than 250k and wanted to drive a CRV I respect that, but keep in mind people value stuff differently and not everyone (with ok financial situation) wanted to drive super low cost cars. Same applies to choosing apartments, dining out and purchasing electronics etc, please don’t force people to have the same values as you.

If you really wanted to talk about cost, renting from enterprise is occasional stuff and also only costs 35/day with code. For a lot of the weekend trips and sports our friend group all have cars and usually share rides. And no I’m not gonna use Uber as often as u assume.

My post is about going carless in JC vs the hassle and cost of owning a car here. Please stop replying if you don’t have the above ^ experiences

−2

EatMorePi t1_j1nxd9c wrote

You are literally asking for personal financial advice here, you’ve said it yourself above: “my post is about…the hassle and COST of owning a car here” (emphasis mine). It’s weird to ask about that while disregarding the idea of a cheaper car. If you rent zip cars, what do you think you’re going to get? Not the kind of car you have now. So if you’re considering a using a cheaper car via something like zipcar, you should also compare that with owning a cheaper car. Of course it’s ultimately your choice, but it’s strange you think this is odd.

1

Substantial-Floor926 t1_j1ptyzg wrote

Love this dude talking about an economic downturn in his post and then bragging about making $250k a year in the comments. F off dude

1

Ilanaspax t1_j1qj6yp wrote

lol I love how everyone saying no car because it’s a city immediately admits they get literally all their groceries and necessities shipped to them via Amazon.

You can’t get this kind of convenience in the burbs am I right guys?

0

SouthernSample t1_j1qminz wrote

Ok, your arguments against the other commenter are getting illogical.

Most "normal people" living in the downtown do not go to the beach or whatever multiple times a week and OP has also said how they spend more and more time working. The biggest upside of living here given the high rent is not needing a car, and that's what a majority of the people in downtown JC do. If you live here and own a car, that's good for you but you're a clear minority.

0

SouthernSample t1_j1qmw3h wrote

Some people don't understand that you don't spend on things and keep losing money just because you have a high income if it doesn't serve its purpose as much. It's a losing battle trying to explain it to them.

−1

Ilanaspax t1_j1qnxmp wrote

The high rent is making some of you delude yourselves into thinking JC is a booming metropolis when it really isn’t. The Path and the lightrail (the two major public transit options that people in JC rely on) absolutely suck on weekends.

The point is with no car you are absolutely limiting yourself if you have a normal 9-5 week day job. If you want to be stuck in downtown JC waiting for the path to go anywhere else on a weekend- have fun with that! I personally find living in a “city” and still relying on Amazon instead of being able to drive to a store to do my own shopping to be pretty bleak (which is what almost everyone without a car is admitting in this thread).

Also should be noted there are parts of JC where public transit sucks 24/7 and you genuinely do need a car to work and have a life - so if you move out of downtown that is something to think of.

0

SouthernSample t1_j1qo9gs wrote

Well, that's your opinion. A majority of residents in JC disagree with them being inconvenient to the point of needing a car. I don't think it would make sense to suggest a car as long as 100% of the residents feel that they don't need one given what OP has stated about themselves.

0

Ilanaspax t1_j1qp8ge wrote

The path and lightrail schedule being terrible on weekends is a fact not an opinion.

And I hate to break it to you buddy but people using JC Reddit does not equal “the majority of residents in JC”. Take a walk outside of downtown JC sometime - there’s a whole big world out there.

1

pixel_of_moral_decay t1_j1sk969 wrote

There’s data behind all of this. Commercial drivers have by far the fewest accidents per mile. It’s not even close.

Likewise, rental cars are about as risky as drunk drivers since so many of them rarely drive. The most likely class of vehicle to kill you in a collision is a rental. Least likely is a truck.

1

pixel_of_moral_decay t1_j1spvqe wrote

Are you really that dumb? You pay based on avg usage and types of driving. You also get rates increased if you get in an accident.

You clearly have never paid for insurance before or you’d know how stupid your argument is, given the first questions you answer are exactly that.

But from mile 0, and per mile, someone who rarely drives will be the biggest burden. That’s just math.

1