Comments
HappyArtichoke7729 OP t1_it7vmsn wrote
cophers be phat as phucc
moobycow t1_itbj6ta wrote
It's all so fucking obvious. Traffic is caused by freeways having more capacity than can reasonably exit/enter from local roads. Adding more freeway does fuckall to fix this.
There is no fix for this other than alternatives to cars because they take up so much damn space.
HappyArtichoke7729 OP t1_itbyx36 wrote
Yet, we have Fulop and the state pushing through a freeway expansion instead of redirecting those funds to build more PATH tracks
moobycow t1_itbzd94 wrote
Fulop is 100% against it.
HappyArtichoke7729 OP t1_itc03uz wrote
Then heads should be rolling to stop it. He says he's against, but what is he doing?
moobycow t1_itc55fi wrote
What do you suggest he should be doing? It's not his call, he can't wave a magic wand and stop it.
He will be part of the inevitable lawsuits.
HappyArtichoke7729 OP t1_itc9xld wrote
He should be contacting the state government daily until it gets canceled, or until he gets a formal written rejection.
He should be investigating, or having his team investigate, and publicly disclose who is benefiting financially from this misguided deal, uncovering the corruption, and publishing it officially.
This is what REAL LEADERSHIP would look like on the ground.
Basilone1917 t1_itcoz1n wrote
Hypothetically, running for Governor in 2025 so he can stop it then.
genius96 t1_ith5m7a wrote
Yes, the mayor of the second largest city in the state should spend all his time calling the state and investigating. Projects like these can be held up in lawsuits, if Fulop doesn't sign on to the lawsuit, then you'd be correct.
SyndicalistCPA t1_it7ubm7 wrote
Traffic may be worse but the coffers of the contracters? The coffers be fat.