Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

cr0wit0 t1_j8tgqiy wrote

Because 4K on a 6 inch screen does not make sense

−3

kapilbhavsar144 t1_j8tgstx wrote

They limit the resolution on Safari; you need to use the app

237

jrs1rules t1_j8tk1k8 wrote

Use the app their is a cap in safari

20

cr0wit0 t1_j8tkvkf wrote

The app might be different.. i dont use the app at all. I use the browser but I’m fine with the 360-720 resolution. It could be your carrier too, i dont have the HD turned-on thru my carrier so I’m just used to it, i mean… is a 6 inch screen. But I heard the app could be different, up to 1080.

−2

prapotnik t1_j8tl303 wrote

Because you may got an older iphone

−11

PhoenixGold_ t1_j8tm1el wrote

You have to use the app there is a limit in safari and the app is way better too. Not sure why ppl refuse to use the app so much

4

cr0wit0 t1_j8tmahk wrote

If you are on cellular, your carrier caps it.. 4k is like 1 gigs per minute so you will strain the network. 1080 is probably 50 megs per minute… so you have to change your plan or activate HD viewing. But the app allows it. I just don’t use because you can not block ads. In safari you can, I use adguard pro. I rather don’t have ads then have 1080… specially when jumping from video to video.

−29

cr0wit0 t1_j8trwmc wrote

Right…. At 60 hz right…. I got the figures from my Apple TV + router .. I wonder if 1080 120hz … i know my tv can not handle 240hz .. something that 4k claims.. don’t care really. But it is a strain on cell carriers so they limit this.

−17

cr0wit0 t1_j8u4ctt wrote

I dont use it that much, I go days without using YouTube. I only use it when I need something technical, like.. how to remove a transmission of an f250.. or idiots on cars when I want to burn time… replacing power steering on a 24 foot boat… stuff like that. I’m not spending a dime on google. Adblocker is a blessing.

−1

cr0wit0 t1_j8u6fn2 wrote

Nah, don’t want to be a mathematician today, i just wanted to make a point regarding 720, 1080, 4k … the more data it uses, the carrier not wanting to do that… all the good stuff and the size of the screen.

Now, in Final Cut.. I do care about bitrates and sound hz…. But not now.

−13

onnethox t1_j8u8hzo wrote

Maybe you have some data saver settings since youre on 5g.

0

RslPride t1_j8ui9yq wrote

Try uYouPlus if you’re using the website for Adblock or background play.

4

JoinetBasteed t1_j8uorl3 wrote

I don't think macOS Safari and iOS Safari are the exact same, I may be wrong but that's what I think. I remember a few years ago the AppleTV couldn't play 4k YouTube videos and that was because Google used a format that Apple was against implementing(Because it was inferior to what Apple already had if I remember correctly)

3

PoweredMorphin t1_j8uu7sr wrote

It’s so annoying. YouTube always loads in 360p by default on iPhone and maxes out at 720p (some videos don’t even get that, but on Safari in macOS gets higher). Even an old iPad Air 2 gets 1080p, but a brand new iPhone is limited to 720p?

9

neelkanth97 t1_j8v8oro wrote

Thats a limitation on safari, if you want an ad blocker app try uYouPlus, no jailbreak needed, just sideload and go.

−1

raygungreg t1_j8vdmm4 wrote

I figured it out. So happy. 😀

Remove YouTube app Create open URL shortcut Add shortcut to home screen with icon pack of your choice. Profit. Vinegar is legit! 👍🏻

5

NathanielIR t1_j8vjori wrote

Google locks the max resolution on the YT website to 720p on mobile to push people to use the app. There’s an awesome Safari extension called Vinegar which will let you watch up to 1080p. Also replaces Google’s player with the native one, removes ads, adds Picture in Picture, and is built by an awesome dev. Well worth the price imo

2

NathanielIR t1_j8vp564 wrote

I’m sure it does. For me and many others, as you said, it’s not worth it. And personally, paywalling a system feature (PiP) which is free on android is just absurd. And on top of that, as I said, I hate the YT UI. Vinegar replacing that UI with the native one is awesome for me. And it also works on my iPad and Mac, where I watch the majority of my content

2

-K9V t1_j8w11ru wrote

You’re too funny. Spewing random numbers that make no sense and then saying “don’t want to be a mathematician today” after being called out on your bullshit.

3

-K9V t1_j8w18j9 wrote

No thanks, never. It’s always been a free service and I am not about to pay for it now. Youtube is a shit platform. I had to install a browser extension just to be able to watch age restricted videos even though I’m way over the age of 18. And that’s because EU made it so YouTube had to require either your ID or your credit card info to verify your age, none of which Google has any business seeing. So fuck YouTube and fuck EU too. Never paying a cent to watch YouTube. Adblock is free.

3

rursache t1_j8wjw1l wrote

Use the app, why would you watch youtube in a browser on mobile?

1

dagaloni t1_j8x6vpw wrote

Just downloaded it and it works amazing! I added the youtube website to my homescreen so I can find it via Spotlight. Amazing experience with Vinegar! And I love that Vinegar can auto select the best quality.

2

-K9V t1_j8xcl6q wrote

I didn’t mind the original little banner ads at the bottom of the video. They were not intrusive and were never a problem. The video ads are what I have a problem with. I’ve used adblocker from the day I installed Chrome.

1

randybruder t1_j8xeemv wrote

Every time I see this asked, the person asking gets highly-upvoted answers that are complete bullshit. You want a real answer?

YouTube stores all of their video files and audio files separately. It's a clever way of saving server space—you can have all of the different video files (at a bunch of different resolutions and video codecs), and then a few audio files (at different bitrates and formats), and then on the fly pick the best video file for the user, pick the best audio file for the user, and play them back at the same time. For example, here's all the individual files that YouTube generates/stores for the Costa Rica video from your post.

In a browser, YouTube uses Media Source Extensions which allows them to combine those video and audio streams, and do things like let you switch resolution without the video stopping (or even dynamically switch the resolution based on available bandwidth without interrupting the video.)

Safari on iOS doesn't support Media Source Extensions. So in addition to the multitude of individual video-only and audio-only streams YouTube generates, they also generate a few versions that include both the video and audio in one file—but only up to 720p. That's why Safari only shoes those options, it's all it's capable of playing, because there's no assembly needed by the browser. (Interestingly, Media Source Extensions is implemented in Safari on iPadOS, which is why you'll see more resolution options there.)

4

gordito_gr t1_j8zcv7h wrote

>(Interestingly, Media Source Extensions is implemented in Safari on iPadOS, which is why you'll see more resolution options there.)

How's that 'interestingly'? Apple surely does try to worsen the experience, no reason not to support media source extensions.

0

gordito_gr t1_j8zd6fy wrote

> It’s always been a free service and I am not about to pay for it now. Youtube is a shit platform.

What a shit attitude, ads are a fair trade off for a great service if you dont wanna pay. Made me cringe HARD reading this

1

-K9V t1_j8zdepw wrote

They do not deserve my money for reasons I described in my initial comment. I will always use adblock everywhere that I and nothing is gonna change my view. I can’t stand ads, and if I can avoid them for free, well you bet I’ll do just that.

1

randybruder t1_j8zt2j3 wrote

> Apple surely does try to worsen the experience

How does Apple "try to worsen the experience"? The obvious guesses are that Apple hadn't gotten to implementing it in a way they want to be performative.

Or maybe Apple intentionally won't enable it because making Safari work smoothly means deciding not to support certain popular technologies, and forcing everyone else to adapt—perfect example of that is Apple's refusal to support Adobe Flash. Was Apple's motivation to not support Flash "trying to worsen the experience"?

1

randybruder t1_j907pa8 wrote

> Stop D riding Apple

My original comment is explaining how the max 720p is literally Apple's fault, and not YouTube's fault. I'm the only one in the entire thread correctly blaming Apple for this. And I'm D riding Apple?

You should try reading the comments before you say stupid shit.

> literally just a codec.

I explained in my comment that it isn't a codec, but a web specification. It's not "Safari doesn't support the V9 codec" like a lot of people mistakenly think—apparently you're misinformed about that too.

> Bruh, this is a fanboy excuse,

Educated guess, not an excuse.

Still waiting on you to explain how "Apple does try to worsen the experience"

0