Submitted by MeatballDom t3_zdonhu in history
How2Eat_That_Thing t1_iz3jprk wrote
>Many of the plaques have two holes at the top, which the team believes makes threading string through them to hang them as ritual objects impractical.
Or it could just be a pendant. And why would holes make it impractical to hang them? Run a string though the holes and tie a knot. That's kinda how we hang most stuff.
Also if there weren't more intricate depictions of owls at the time then why assume it was children making them? Most petroglyphs from this period weren't exactly what you'd call anatomically correct.
flowering_sun_star t1_iz6dvvz wrote
Yeah, that struck me as a pile of bollocks. In fact if you want something to hang flat in a particular orientation then two holes like that possibly the best way to go. You can have a single thread enter from the back, cross to the other, and leave to the back again. It can't easily rotate without twisting together the two end of the thread, and the separation between them makes that harder.
Maybe the holes were for something else, but this logic sounds like they wanted to find an excuse to reject the simpler explanation.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments