Why did so few Roman emperors have biological children? Submitted by hazhulkha t3_z92bu9 on November 30, 2022 at 8:32 PM in history 19 comments 1,706
TheFirstArticle t1_iyewghc wrote on November 30, 2022 at 9:48 PM I would guess they often just did not have acknowledged children. Which might be the only way they'd have living descendants at all since wiping out all your family is a pretty common theme. It makes it a selection advantage. Permalink 7
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments