Submitted by IslandChillin t3_z1yao6 in history
relefos t1_ixdyuzc wrote
Reply to comment by iamerudite in Ancient Egyptian mummification was never intended to preserve bodies by IslandChillin
I think it isn't a 180 simply because we were all taught about how basically every other part of the ritual, their tombs, etc. revolved around making their afterlife experience easier / better in some way shape or form
So learning that they may have mummified the bodies for the sake of that person's afterlife, with preservation being a byproduct, isn't really a huge revelation. It's neat and definitely different than what we all thought, but it's more like a 90, not a 180, if that makes sense
AnthonyTyrael t1_ixe8gke wrote
The difference here is between body and soul. As far as I'm understanding it. Preserving body meant to transfer both into afterlife, body intact and soul too. The new thesis is, it was just meant to preserve the soul, the body isn't needed in afterlife. That's a big difference in belief and religion.
Pre-Astronautics will be happy to hear about it.
What doesn't make sense to me here is, why take all the organs out if the body doesn't matter, just the spirit?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments