Submitted by Maxwellsdemon17 t3_yjd0l3 in history
clicheguevara8 t1_iur0ikm wrote
Reply to comment by kromem in Does Science Need History? A Conversation with Lorraine Daston by Maxwellsdemon17
This is really misleading, although I thoroughly agree in general about the importance of intellectual history.
The Epicurean/Atomist hypothesis has everything to do with Greek philosophy of the 5th and 4th centuries BCE, and has little bearing on 20th century physics. Platonism, Aristotelianism and specifically Averroism was much more influential on Renaissance science than Lucretius. The intellectual context of Renaissance and Enlightenment science was much more complex and pluralistic than the usual textbook narrative suggests.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments