Submitted by GullyShotta t3_ybzgq9 in history
SlothOfDoom t1_itjmryn wrote
> “one of its kind”
Although accurate, that's probably not the phrase they were looking for.
bleh19799791 t1_itkijmu wrote
Out of all the necklaces ever made, it was definitely one of them.
[deleted] t1_itms5cp wrote
[removed]
Jaijoles t1_itkwdpx wrote
That’s the phrase that was used though. If you go through to the original article they said
“This one is this far the only one of its kind in Halland”.
The secondary article made it sound worse by leaving of the other words.
juanvaldezmyhero t1_itl9tph wrote
only is the operative word they dropped
Jaijoles t1_itlb46w wrote
Right? It just fully changes the meaning.
McDuchess t1_ituqxq2 wrote
Let’s see. This amulet, similar to those found in other parts of Scandinavia, is the first of its kind to be found in Halland.
Clearer, yes?
NapClub t1_itlb0tf wrote
This kind of thing is actually quite common. Not as common as hammer heads buried in the ground but like, one of the more common trinkets.
[deleted] t1_itkbo40 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_itkc5lb wrote
[removed]
h2ogie t1_itm8z5l wrote
It actually looks startlingly similar to the design found in Ödeshög https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Archaeological_record_of_Mj%C3%B6llnir
Ferengi_Earwax t1_itlqnis wrote
Thurkill has a boatload of these. He also has crosses for the slaves.
Askmyrkr t1_itn9up6 wrote
Came to ask how it was special
[deleted] t1_itkrqjd wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_itkw1h4 wrote
[deleted]
lollerkeet t1_itkofna wrote
Sweden is not an amazing location for a find like this.
Wetwire98 t1_itl89zg wrote
What do you mean? They’re mostly talking about that it’s amazing they found it in Halland (Part of Sweden) because they haven’t found one there before.
bronhoms t1_itlo2iz wrote
Its not “amazing”, because most would expect one in sweden. I am not amazed. Quite sure theyre not either. Interesting though.
[deleted] t1_itkrh2a wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments