Submitted by AutoModerator t3_11ojmfz in history
tatramatra t1_jc1dp3f wrote
Reply to comment by Crimson_Marksman in Weekly History Questions Thread. by AutoModerator
(Eastern Asiatic) martial arts were generally developed as a substitute to combat with weapons where weapons were restricted. For example when some classes of the society were forbidden to own weapons (slaves, peasants) or geographical restrictions of weapons (ban of weapons in towns). This actually includes not just bare hand fighting but also substituting weapons with some other objects and tools, like farming tools (nunchagu might be the most famous example).
Therefore it's safe to say that it occurred often. But that does not mean that it was a good or proficient way of fighting. More like something out of necessity.
Crimson_Marksman t1_jc1g475 wrote
Fair enough.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments