Submitted by AutoModerator t3_11ojmfz in history
TheBattler t1_jbvkkpz wrote
Reply to comment by Crimson_Marksman in Weekly History Questions Thread. by AutoModerator
It actually happened very often, especially if both men were similarly armed and armored. I'm gonna assume you're referring to pre-modern battles since you mention Samurais and swords.
Usually, the majority of an army was infantrymen wielding melee weapons, and in fact the word "melee" refers to the confusing, scary part of pre-modern battles where two infantry contingents finally clash and don't have much room to maneuver.
Medieval European martial arts manuals have sections on hand to hand combat, including grappling an enemy with a sword or spear with and without your own weapons.
Indian martial arts under the broad label of Kalaripayattu include armed and unarmed instruction. Same with Chinese martial arts.
I don't really know much about other parts of the world, but wrestling and grappling seems to be a fairly universal past-time. You even see Mongol and Turkic wrestling traditions, and those dudes were most famous for horseback fighting. Those skills would probably be necessary for lance-wielding cavalry if they get dismounted.
Crimson_Marksman t1_jbvm2l3 wrote
I meant like, Bruce Lee punching an armored knight out.
TheBattler t1_jbvnily wrote
Oh, that uh I dunno. I'm sure it happened just super rarely.
[deleted] t1_jbx0fa2 wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments