Submitted by AutoModerator t3_11ojmfz in history
Thibaudborny t1_jbtq9w0 wrote
Reply to comment by Hour-Weather-5354 in Weekly History Questions Thread. by AutoModerator
In broad lines, it will define socioeconomic conditions, which in turn will influence the sociopolitical superstructure. Think, for example, how you won't have a land of plenty up on the slopes of the Alps with early agriculture.
More niche perhaps, take medieval Flanders, the prevalence of flooding in the coastal areas prompted the formation of large-scale land holdings, directed towards commercial exploitation, creating a proto-capitalist dynamic & in part underpinning the wealth of this region. Once you move a little inland, you see a drastic change in the structure of landownership, with widespread subsistence farming being the norm, and the land being divided in a multitude of smaller holdings.
LaoBa t1_jchm2tz wrote
The same pattern can be found in the Netherlands. Large farms and rich farmers in former swamp areas, small farms and poor farmers on sandy inland soil.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments