Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

egg_static5 OP t1_jb9sdbe wrote

Emperor Claudius, whom archaeologists believe the statue's smiling features may belong to, extended Roman rule into North Africa between 41 and 54 AD.

239

CountAurelian t1_jbbdrkn wrote

Am I misreading this? The Romans had been in North Africa since the Punic Wars. Literally the most famous era of Roman history ends with dominion over Egypt years before Claudius.

112

NuffNuffNuff t1_jbbgjz2 wrote

It's worded incorectly, he extended Roman rule IN North Africa, not INTO North Africa. (He annexed Mauretania)

168

lawyerjsd t1_jbczqir wrote

Neat fact: Egypt was the personal property of the Roman emperor. Not part of Rome, but his personal property.

26

DaddyCatALSO t1_jbd0fr8 wrote

The governor of egypt had a unique title, not one of the other two used elsewhere in the empire

11

rtb001 t1_jbeo96z wrote

I believe the governor had to be of equestrian real, because the emperor didn't want a senator to oversee Egypt and potentially build a power base there.

Supposedly senators were not even allowed to VISIT Egypt, let alone govern it, such was its importance.

4

B1ueEyesWh1teDragon t1_jbestvi wrote

If I recall correctly from the History of Rome podcast, Egypt was the richest Roman province and also supplied a majority of the food to the empire as well. So it makes perfect sense to not have a third party like a senator govern it if you’re the emperor. That’s begging for rebellion.

3

rtb001 t1_jbf181l wrote

It wasn't just Egypt, although Egypt was particularly key to the Emperor. Most Roman provinces were also not given to the senate to appoint a governor. Only a small subset of centrally located provinces along Italy itself and the Mediterranean were called "senatorial provinces". The key frontier provinces, where most of the troops are (Britain, Danube, Rhine, Syria etc) were imperial provinces, where the Emperor directly appointed governors, again to make sure only the people he trusts are given military commands.

2

Welshhoppo t1_jbesyhw wrote

That's because the last time a senator was in Egypt. That was Mark Antony.

We think it's one of the reasons Germanicus was done in by Tiberius. Because he was a popular senator who went to Egypt without permission.

2

rtb001 t1_jbf3uj2 wrote

Although if Tiberius really did assassinate Germanicus, he would have done it whether Germanicus set foot in Egypt or not. Not only was Germanicus more popular than Tiberius's own son Drusus, he also has closer bloodline to Augustus himself, being the grandson of Augustus' sister Octavia.

1

Welshhoppo t1_jbfata4 wrote

Considering how little Tiberius seems to have wanted to be Emperor, I put the entire blame of his death on Piso.

1