Submitted by AutoModerator t3_11hylr5 in history
Apprehensive-Bad-651 t1_javs4cb wrote
How common was racism within the different ethnicities of White Americans back in the day?
bangdazap t1_javwfrk wrote
It's more of a case of who was defined as "white". Benjamin Franklin once warned Americans to be vary of "swarthy" people, like the French and Swedes. Irish people weren't considered white initially and it was common for places looking for workers to display the sign "Irish need not apply". In turn, later Italian immigrants had to build their own churches because they, albeit Catholic, weren't allowed to use Irish churches.
Jews were also not considered white, and establishments that didn't allow Jews were labeled "restricted". More recently, Hispanics are more and more considered to be white in America, which they weren't previously.
Iggy_spots t1_jawop52 wrote
My Jewish immigrant ancestors had their race listed as Hebrew on ship manifests.
Nonskew2 t1_jaxkwyj wrote
Did he say Swedes were swarthy? Sami maybe, but not Swedes..
elmonoenano t1_jaxsxpf wrote
There was a good /r/askhistorians about this if you're curious.
Doctor_Impossible_ t1_jay6u01 wrote
Racism is not just about actual skin colour, but perception of that 'race'.
bangdazap t1_jazqn53 wrote
>Which leads me to add one remark, that the number of purely white people in the world is proportionably very small. All Africa is black or tawny; Asia chiefly tawny; America (exclusive of the new comers) wholly so. And in Europe, the Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians, and Swedes, are generally of what we call a swarthy complexion; as are the Germans also, the Saxons only excepted, who, with the English, make the principal body of white people on the face of the earth.
Benjamin Franklin, “Observations Concerning the Increase of Mankind, People of Countries, Etc.” (1751)
Prejudice blinds you to the facts of reality I guess.
CraftyRole4567 t1_jaxfvq0 wrote
Historian here, I would agree that it’s not going to be as simple as looking at ethnicity. You also need to look at region and particularly at economic competition. For example, there were Irish immigrants and free Blacks in antebellum New York City who shared neighborhoods, saloons, and intermixed culture (where tap dancing comes from), but you can also find wealthy Blacks hiring the Irish as servants in Boston and looking down on them, and you can also find virulent, ugly racism in Irish-American communities made visible in the Boston Busing Crisis, for instance.
Forsaken_Champion722 t1_jawbq6x wrote
I like your question and bangdazap's reply, but I find that there is some confusion about the use of the term "racism". As a child in the 70s, I remember the famous PSA of a boy asking his grandpa what prejudice is. It seemed to me that racism was just one form of prejudice, and did not include prejudice based on religious beliefs or ethnic grudges among different people of the same race.
As far as prejudice among different white ethnic and religious groups, the answer is that it was very common. However, it is difficult to say precisely when prejudice based on religion and ethnicity becomes actual racism, based on biological/genetic differences.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments