Submitted by Yazan_Research t3_119pkjh in history
huntt252 t1_j9rznd1 wrote
Reply to comment by Cleistheknees in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
Not trying to argue but large ungulates are very easy to kill with a single shot from an arrow. Regardless of primitive or advanced archery gear. If something sharp passes through the lungs or heart of a large ungulate like elk or moose, then they tend to die rapidly. The vasculature is so condensed in this region that cutting it causes massive blood loss and rapid death. It wouldn’t happen with a wood tipped arrow. But with freshly flaked stone it absolutely would.
Cleistheknees t1_j9s1g9t wrote
Anyone is welcome to argue whatever point they’d like.
In this context, large ungulates = hippopotamus, bison, elephants, rhinoceros, large boars, etc, because the actual animals in this discussion are generally extinct Pleistocene megafauna, not white tailed deer, which I agree are not difficult at all to drop in one shot for an experience or lucky hunter. The ambiguity here is probably because “large ungulate” means something different to me as an evolutionary biologist than it does to hunters. I hunt, but I wouldn’t really call myself “a hunter”, if that makes sense.
> If something sharp passes through the lungs or heart of a large ungulate like elk or moose, then they tend to die rapidly.
Rapidly seems kinda relative. I’ve double lung punched a prairie elk and had to go over two kilometers to get it.
eMPereb t1_j9s6g72 wrote
Hmmm… But the “point” is the “point?”
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments