Submitted by Yazan_Research t3_119pkjh in history
Khtie t1_j9rqzgb wrote
How the heck have people been around for 50000 yrs but only started advancing technology in the last 100??? Wild
ToasterSmokes t1_j9rrit2 wrote
Humans haven’t just started advancing technologically in the past 100 years. Technological advancement goes back thousands of years - it just started exponentially advancing in the past 100 or so.
MongoBongoTown t1_j9sbsk6 wrote
It's crazy looking at this with military tech.
A Roman Army from 250 BCE could very possibly defeat a Celtic Army from 1000 years in the future.
But...an Army from 1960 would be absolutely decimated by a modern military.
Jewrisprudent t1_j9sg2t1 wrote
In a way it’s always exponentially advancing, it’s just when you’re in the middle of exponential growth nearly all of the absolute growth has occurred recently.
Maskeno t1_j9s2m0k wrote
Define advanced? A cannon is pretty damn advanced compared to a trebuchet compared to a spear. We definitely experienced massive booms, and technology seems to advance on a ramp that makes it go faster and faster, but that just means 50k years from now they might laugh and say we were so primitive.
[deleted] t1_j9sblgb wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j9sjl3y wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9vlrxi wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments