akskigirl OP t1_j99svro wrote
Archaeologists re-analysed a previously discovered object and discovered use wear patterns which suggest it was definitely not a darning tool has had been previously assumed..
Raudskeggr t1_j9dxbfg wrote
Of course their examination, while being able to tell us what it probably wasn't, didn't bring us terribly much closer to knowing what it actually was:
>Although we conclude here with no definitive interpretation of the Vindolanda phallus, we hope to have prompted the search for similar objects elsewhere and encouraged their meaningful incorporation into narratives of the past.
[deleted] t1_j9cxvk2 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9czucl wrote
[removed]
MundanePlantain1 t1_j9eh5ny wrote
Could be a part of a game.
An object of totemic value.
A stylised tool.
[deleted] t1_j9d1h0j wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9djfht wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments