Fireantstirfry t1_j7mpufy wrote
Reply to comment by kawhi_2020 in Would the Allies have kept fighting if the axis powers stopped? by Techno-87
It's always really nice seeing a balanced and objective comment regarding Churchill. So refreshing.
the_better_twin t1_j7ms9rw wrote
I mean you just have read about Gallipoli to know he wasn't infallible and made plenty of mistakes. It is very easy to judge someone with the benefit of hindsight however.
hamandcheese_1 t1_j7mtgwg wrote
History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it.
Nonions t1_j7mwmi6 wrote
In fairness about Gallipoli, I don't think they actually followed through with Churchill's actual plan. If they had steamed through and just taken the losses in old obsolete battleships it might have worked with considerably fewer deaths.
kawhi_2020 t1_j7mxcis wrote
Roosevelt judged Churchill accurately at the time. Churchill was an imperialist and Roosevelt (while certainly always pushing American political and commercial interests) did support the independence of India and other colonial territories.
De Gaulle was another imperialist that Roosevelt didnt like too much, but agreed to work with (though certainly not at the level of Churchill, for practical reasons).
[deleted] t1_j7mthf4 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j7mts55 wrote
[deleted]
NickRick t1_j7mwyru wrote
>Hitler2.0, did you mean Thatcher Alpha Version?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments