EpsomHorse t1_j7dwhnh wrote
Reply to comment by duncan345 in Lead Plates and Land Claims in North America and Europe: When did the practice begin of burying lead plates to establish ownership of land, and why did it die out, and was it ever used successfully in a court of law to establish ownership? by whyenn
> Surveyors have been burying metal markers to establish boundary lines for a long time.
Why would you bury things that are supposed to serve as markers? Why not put a plaque qt ground level, or drive a pin down vertically until it's half buried, or use a stone marker above the ground?
AstarteHilzarie t1_j7e1u0v wrote
Things above ground are easily moved, intentionally tampered with, or removed by someone who doesn't realize the significance. Burying it makes it a more secure option, especially when you want it to stay put for decades or centuries. People who are looking for it can easily find it with the right tools, but it won't be bothersome to people who don't need access to it.
EpsomHorse t1_j7elgni wrote
I appreciate the answer!
Sawendro t1_j7e88c2 wrote
If the person trying to move the boundary line doesn't know about the buried marker, then it is much easier to call them on their bullshit, basically. A fence can be moved and rocks relocated, but unless you know where the underground markers are and can dig up and rebury them...
EpsomHorse t1_j7elf1r wrote
Thanks. I hadn't considered bad faith actors.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments