Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

thatcarolguy t1_j6oqjwb wrote

Reply to comment by szymonhimself in r/NoStupidQuestions: theoretically, could one access the Moondrop Quarks DSP's DSP code and edit it, changing its sound, in the manner of a "native EQ"? by Fernando1dois3

It is incredibly groundbreaking. It completely Destroyed the Chu and made it obsolete while the Chu already did that to the $20 price bracket.

And there is no such thing as the technical department. It's imagined by people who can't accept that a $20 IEM is the real deal.

−4

szymonhimself t1_j6otq44 wrote

I'll give you the first point. Chu was garbage, Quarks were pretty good, Quarks DSP are even better than that.

And lmao cope harder.

4

thatcarolguy t1_j6p3n0l wrote

No need to cope. I've got my end game IEM until something better eventually comes for $20.

1

Bal_u t1_j6otyiq wrote

You might like its frequency response very much, but there's absolutely nothing groundbreaking about it. It's just another $20 IEM, much like the Chu was just another $20 IEM. Technicalities existing is not something that can even be debated.

0

thatcarolguy t1_j6p3zbv wrote

Why do you call it a $20 IEM as if it is an insult? That just makes it all the more groundbreaking. It is an extreme revolution in price/performance as it is better than the vast majority of IEMs including ones that are 100x the price.

What kind of thing are you looking for to qualify as "groundbreaking"?

0

Bal_u t1_j6p9srh wrote

You mentioned the price the exact same number of times as I did. It's nice that we're clarifying the bracket they're competing in - the Chu most certainly didn't have a shot of competing with more expensive IEMs, and I very much doubt the Quarks DSP does. Hell, the Chu is quite far from my preferred $20 IEMs, even.
There's just a limit to how much you can do at this price point, the significantly better technicalities in more expensive earphones are related to their better drivers.

1