dimesian t1_j6fulkp wrote
Reply to comment by Freestalker_dot_fr in [Headphone measurements] Erm... This is very embarrassing... Sorry for the bad news... -_- by Freestalker_dot_fr
Why are you telling people not to read the text? Do you think they're unable to judge the validity of it for themselves?
Freestalker_dot_fr OP t1_j6hdnl1 wrote
It's to not lose their time
dimesian t1_j6kfkzr wrote
When someone says look at this but, not at this part, it seems like they don't want people to look at something that doesn't support their position, particularly when they say it more than once, it draws attention to it, making it more likely that people will read it and doubt their integrity.
Freestalker_dot_fr OP t1_j6mdkui wrote
I personally didn't take the time to read the text because it didn't look like a scientifical document. No explicite methodology part and so on. The only thing that can't be subject to personal opinion are graphs. About the figure 17, it's not the K371, it's another headphone on the graph.
I had no intentions to support a position. Do you know what cognitive biases are ? I hope yes because I know what they are. I'm not the kind of people that want to manipulate others.
Freestalker_dot_fr OP t1_j6mlca6 wrote
BTW thank you to have taken the time to explain me that what I said was looking like manipulation. I take note
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments