Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

owoflux OP t1_j1nukdx wrote

CORRECTION: 6.3mm not 4.4mm but nevertheless this is strange. This is my second pair of HD 560s and the cable is also noticeably nicer than the previous.

edit: The first pair I bought a month ago from Best Buy and it came with the really shitty cable and adapter. I can't A/B test between the two since I gifted it to a friend but I don't think there is a difference in sound.

6

PolarBearSequence t1_j1nv84a wrote

Surprising. I bought one about two months ago (as a gift), and they came with the long 6.35 terminated cable and an adapter cable to 3.5.

15

bbuky01 t1_j1nvbqa wrote

I just looked on Amazon and did not see a 4.4mm option though didn't look hard but not a common option for the 560s.

2

smg5284 t1_j1nwhmx wrote

Mine came with the regular cable + adapter two weeks ago.

2

fUSTERcLUCK_02 t1_j1nx515 wrote

Maybe they've changed the cable. When I got my HD599 a while ago, they came with a 2.5-6.35 with an adapter that went the other way round. I mean realistically, it makes little to zero difference in terms of practicality but it's interesting to see these minor changes.

9

owoflux OP t1_j1nybhg wrote

It was always 2.5mm from headphone into a 6.3mm and the cable comes with a really long thick 6.3mm to 3.5mm adapter. I guess they silently updated it for the consumer market.

1

llIicit t1_j1nzarr wrote

So you have the 2.5mm that plugs into the headphone, which terminates into a 3.5mm, and has a 6.3mm screw on adapter for other inputs. That’s exactly what you should get.

Are you complaining that you didn’t get the worse 6.3mm cable with a 6.3mm to 3.5mm adapter, which puts immense stress on more delicate 3.5mm jacks? What is the issue exactly?

4

Silver-Ad8136 t1_j1o0pt4 wrote

What even is 1/4", amirite? And between the plug and the adapter had nearly 4" hanging out of my PC, which just seemed...inelegant, so I bought a coiled replacement, and then went 4.4mm balanced...and then got 6xxs. It's been sort of a little ride, sure.

2

smoakee t1_j1o1ijf wrote

Im either really dumb, or you are dealing with an absolute non issue.

5

daddyyeslegs t1_j1ow2sr wrote

I'd consider yourself lucky, that cable blows the original one out the water in usability.

1

snozerd t1_j1oyxf6 wrote

Lame.. i got the old chunky cable with the huge adaptor.

1

DepressMyCNS t1_j1pvfm0 wrote

It actually is a small issue as 3.5mm can't provide a Balanced connection meaning you can't used a DAC/Amp with truly Balanced outputs, even if you adapt 3.5mm to 4.4mm or 2.5mm its not going to be able to benefit from a Balanced connection because the signal gets converted back to 3.5mm before the signal goes up the cord. I would reccomend buying a replacement 2.5mm to 4.4mm if that's something you care about and your dac offers it. Otherwise the 3.5mm to 6.3 adapter isn't going to make much of a difference because 6.3 connections are rarely if ever Balanced.

So it depends on your situation if that's an issue or not.

1

G_pea_eS t1_j1qmuxz wrote

The previous cable it came (1/4") with couldn't do balanced either. The OP made a mistake in the title, as the 560S never came with a balanced cable (4.4mm).

I agree with you, though. I used a balanced (2.5mm) cable with my 560S while I owned them.

1

DepressMyCNS t1_j1rawdt wrote

Ahhh okay, I wasn't sure because my HD800s came with a 4.4mm balanced cable as well as the 1/4 inch cable. So I thought it was possible. They cost like $200 to replace each cable it's nuts. Honestly upgrading to balanced connection can provide a lot more volume depending on the source usually it almost doubles the output.

1

Zokuva t1_j1rf5z3 wrote

I got mine with the 3m 6.3mm cable and the 3.5mm adapter about 3 weeks ago. Immediately bought a shorter 3.5mm cable because that one annoyed me + its way too long for my needs

1

difused_shade t1_j1rgeiz wrote

Isn’t this 2.5 to 2.5+adapter? Can’t you just unscrew the adapter and buy a 4.4 one if you need it?

1