Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

klogg4 t1_ixucp2y wrote

>To hear bass you must play a track that contains bass.

It's the opposite - to hear the lack of bass you must play a track that contains bass.

(more shitposts, let's go)

17

RobynDeMol OP t1_ixud7sl wrote

To my personal beliefs I'd say hearing bass where it's intended, no more no less, is fundamentally what makes a good pair of cans. This ofcourse only considering potential low-end capabilities.

I just completely disagree with the sentiment that bassheads cannot find an appropriate amount of energy in the low-end, I'm really not experiencing dissatisfaction at all and don't see how the majority of customers would, not including extremes on the listeners spectrum.

−3

klogg4 t1_ixueu0h wrote

>I'm really not experiencing dissatisfaction

Good for you. What people talk about is the lack of subbass, 20-80 hz. Every Sennheiser of this series has this problem, and it would be ignorant to argue that. Yes, that doesn't make them necessarily worse, especially considering it's not that needed in most genres, but the problem is there and it's worse than even some competing open-backs, like AKG K6**/K7** series.

11

RobynDeMol OP t1_ixufefz wrote

I wont challenge your argument regarding the readings.

I'm just trying to make a point that these are perfectly serviceable, in a realistic usecase scenario. thanks for mentioning the technicalities though, cheers.

1