KenBalbari t1_it4im2i wrote on October 20, 2022 at 9:40 PM

You might not notice quite as much the resolution difference between a $1000 vs $200 headphone, but certainly you will still hear the improvement in headphones in the $200-$300 range (like Sundara, HD6xx, R70x) compared to < $100 headphones.

With that said, getting a tuning you like will be more important than resolution, anyway. So starting in the ~$100 range, and learning to use EQ, can be a good idea too. You will know better where to spend your money once you have a clear idea what your own preferences are. And finding a place where you can actually try some things for yourself before buying might also help. Trust your own ears.

fdbeyaz OP t1_it4jkwe wrote on October 20, 2022 at 9:47 PM

Interesting. I never used the EQ. I mostly listen to music on the iPhone (using Plex) but never played around with the EQ.

Do you just randomly drag the EQ handles and see what „sounds good“ or are there EQ settings that are recommended?

PolemiGD t1_it4zlct wrote on October 20, 2022 at 11:46 PM

It was talking about parametric EQ although a graphic eq could also help knowing your taste. For parametric eq it is better to use android or windows. On mac the choices are not easy and ios is just not viable for parametric eq as far as I know.

OverlyReductionist t1_it55wza wrote on October 21, 2022 at 12:34 AM

Honestly Mac EQ has been easier for me than equalizer APO on windows. I just used hosting AU along with AUNBandEQ.

It works pretty much flawlessly and with none of the weird glitchiness of equalizerAPO/peace, which would periodically stop working, introduce distracting static, or have other issues.

KenBalbari t1_it5xbvk wrote on October 21, 2022 at 4:06 AM

I do recommend playing around with it, dragging handles and seeing if you notice the changes. There's a simple logic to it, they are laid out from the lowest frequencies to the highest.

If you know anything about music, if you ever played an instrument like piano or guitar, it might also be helpful to compare to the frequencies of notes. The lowest note on a standard 88-key piano is 27.5 Hz, and the highest ~ 4 kHz. Middle C is ~ 260 Hz. An octave above that, 520 Hz is in the range of a male tenor, and two octaves above middle C is ~ 1kHz, which might be important for female vocals. Over 2kHz and you start getting to frequencies that are more important for harmonics, and things like cymbals. You probably can't hear over ~ 15 kHz.

So it probably won't sound good to randomly swing one slider up and the next down. But if you think the bass end is a little weak, you might want to boost 30Hz-80Hz by a few decibels, and then taper down to 0 boost by ~ 120 Hz. Or if you think vocals sound a little recessed on your headphone, you might try boosting somewhere in the midrange (200Hz to 2kHz). It might be best not to adjust anything by more than around 5 decibels to start (well other than to play around). That should be enough to hear some changes.

In any case, once you understand how these curves work with EQ, you will then have a better understanding of headphone frequency response curves. They are measuring the same thing.

If there are presets available, they can be a good place to start. If someone has made a tuning intended to fit the Harman curve, that should sound good to nearly 2/3 of people. But to me, using someone else's EQ settings can be a bit like using someone else's eyeglasses. Your ears aren't the same size and shape as everyone else, so you may hear a different frequency response then someone else's measurement suggests.