Submitted by slooploop2 t3_yfp3ad in headphones
LucasRunner t1_iu62fqd wrote
Reply to comment by slooploop2 in Hifiman HE400SE Versus HD560S - Modestly Priced Madness by slooploop2
Oh I see, you input is very welcome
You're not the first one ive heard saying the 1266 weren't dynamic.
Audeze LCD4's, ive read wonders about them but people always seem to bash them for not being "technical" enough, hence the LCD5 taking such hard left turn.
Too bad it weights as much as a small vehicle because it sure looks like a piece of jewelry.
Now about the HE6... ill dig more about them : )
slooploop2 OP t1_iu64gra wrote
I was able to compare the LCD4 and LCD5 back to back and was actually disappointed that the LCD5 sounded less technically capable to me. It traded some (much needed) pinna gain in exchange for losing the dynamics and resolution that Audeze finally got right with the LCD4. I’d been waiting for the LCD5 to come out for a while and…there’s a reason I see them selling for half their MSRP a year after their release. It has the exact issue I have with a lot of planars: they compress dynamics to make quiet sounds more apparent, but they really do sound like a step down in technical ability. Definitely a step up in comfort though.
Wellhellob t1_iu7df5t wrote
Did you heard the hd800s ? How is that one in dynamics department compared to planars ?
slooploop2 OP t1_iu9xkaw wrote
I’ve owned four different HD800 and used a few pairs of HD800S. The later serial number (>10,000) HD800 and HD800S sounded a little thicker and less dynamic than the early SN HD800 to me but all of them were more dynamic than the outlier planars I’ve heard.
Wellhellob t1_iuclppk wrote
Yeah thats what i imagined.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments