Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Electrical-Monitor27 t1_j98l3uw wrote

Reply to comment by BedRevolutionary4418 in just a newbie, what do you think? by flores_amarillas

Hd600 is objectively better though in terms of tonality

3

Titouan_Charles t1_j99zk7r wrote

Objective, and tonality in the same sentence ? You okay buddy ?

2

Electrical-Monitor27 t1_j9a08fc wrote

Tonality in terms of how it sounds compared to neutral. Hd600 has a much smaller scoop than 660s2 thus making it closer to 5128 hrtf. The 660s seems to have a much worse timbre on paper too

1

Titouan_Charles t1_j9a5jkn wrote

You're too caught up in graphs my dude, the 600 is way too narrow and mid focused to be considered neutral. 5128 is a better tool, I agree, but it's still far from the best we can do with human ears

−2

Electrical-Monitor27 t1_j9atuyu wrote

It depends on how much your hrtf differs from 5128 honestly. Measurements on a 43ag do show that hd600 has too much mids compared to 43ag diffuse field but on 5128 diffuse field the hd600 seems to closely match it apart from the 8khz peak that was not visible on the 43ag and the 4.5khz scoop. Meanwhile the 660s2 has some really bad dips. I already eq-ed my 600 to 660s2 and the scoop makes the neutral tonality feel off

1

Titouan_Charles t1_j9b32hz wrote

My reference is the 800S with a reduced 3400Hz, and another cut @7400 and 9100Hz

1