Persona 5 canon(tagged as spoiler just in case)

Submitted by memeguy66 t3_zzs5t1 in gaming

Hello everyone I got a question about the persona 5 canon(probably has been asked already) but it’s more of how I should view it(unless other wise) Anyway here’s the ways I could view it

  1. Persona 5 royal is canon to strikers but due to development stuff(starting development at different times or not enough communication between teams) is why they don’t mention each other
  2. The royal content is more of an alternate reality continuation of the game

Or has Atlas said other wise about the whole canon

I would really appreciate if someone could help me out thank you in advance

0

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

minev1128 t1_j2d9zsv wrote

Both are canon.

2

memeguy66 OP t1_j2da3ph wrote

So basically the 1st way I think of it is right

1

minev1128 t1_j2dalsw wrote

Honestly whichever works for you. Royale's ending works well too even if there's no mention of Dr. Maruki, since Maruki manipulated reality at that point and Kasumi went overseas to train after the events.

2

memeguy66 OP t1_j2daux4 wrote

Makes sense even when I do play strikers and then Atlas then says it’s not canon due to royal I will still be happy(if I enjoy it)so it probably won’t matter in the future

1

memeguy66 OP t1_j2dbohc wrote

It’s kind of like the old Star Wars games that they aren’t but they are still have good story’s even tho they aren’t canon

1

minev1128 t1_j2ddnot wrote

But don't forget both are canon here.

2

memeguy66 OP t1_j2ddu8p wrote

Yeah I just I decided that just because strikers doesn’t mention anything from royal doesn’t mean strikers is not canon to royal

2

minev1128 t1_j2df333 wrote

Yup

2

memeguy66 OP t1_j2df4up wrote

Anyway thanks for you help I really appreciate it I’m guessing you have done this before

1

minev1128 t1_j2dfz3u wrote

I've asked this question before also hehe

2