Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Ordinary-Flounder675 OP t1_iyc04z6 wrote

Reply to comment by Pineapplewelder in What game do you think is really hated but doesn’t deserve it? by Ordinary-Flounder675

It sucks that modern gaming is all about putting it out as fast as possible and then finishing it later. First impressions are everything. Personally, I’m the kinda guy to get a game at launch (where it starts out shitty) and then play that game throughout its whole lifecycle. Halo infinite is an example. Game is still not great but it has gotten better and I have know doubt it will be good by the end. I just wish it would’ve come in swinging.

0

Pineapplewelder t1_iyc0utx wrote

I have to very strongly point at NMS for this one. FFXV was a good game in MY opinion but alot of people seem to still not like it. Hello Games has basically delivered what they promised with NMS, it just took them a little longer than expected. And that I can respect. All the DLC is free. They just ran out of time.

2

Ordinary-Flounder675 OP t1_iyc179z wrote

I still haven’t checked it out cause I wanna play it in VR first. I just need to get a PC which I plan to anyways. I already have the headset.

1

Pineapplewelder t1_iyc48m6 wrote

No Man's Sky is a perfect example of a development that just ran out of time. I don't mean to dote all over it, it has it's faults. But like I previously said, all of the DLC was free, and it made the game almost what was promised. (I still feel like they have more up their sleeve). I don't necessarily feel like it's companies taking the short road, I feel it's more the market. To be successful in this current industry, you need almost a game a year. Which just isn't doable. COD and sports games (which I have no problem with at all) just set the tone of "you need a new game every year when people expect it to come out." Long gone are the days of a masterpiece being worked on and dealt with until its release. Sadly.

2