TiredHappyDad t1_iubs2cj wrote
Rdr2 had an amazing story and world, but I never considered it high on the "fun factor". It was too slow paced. I would Cyberpunk ahead for for fun.
DanSanderman t1_iuc8sbl wrote
That's interesting. I loved RDR2 and thought Cyberpunk was hella boring. There's a lot of talking in RDR2 but at least they usually give you something to look at while they're talking. Cyberpunk has hours of expository dialog and it's pretty much all just standing there in some dark room.
TiredHappyDad t1_iuctpom wrote
Presentation was definitely better in rdr2, but I am meaning the pacing and actual gameplay. In cyberpunk we would get a few minutes of cut scene at the beginning and end of a quest line with radio chat in between during the 1 minutes drive between different quest locations. In red dead we are lucky to actually spend 5 minutes every half hour dealing with enemies.
DamashiT t1_iucype8 wrote
RDR isn't your typical game. I'd say it's more of an interactive experience. Most people enjoyed it, I didn't. I don't like westerns and (for me) this whole game was just a film that required me to travel on a horse to see another scene and very rarely shoot somebody.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments