Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Manjorno316 t1_jac98ci wrote

Reply to comment by kennyh90 in Remake of a...remake? by [deleted]

I had a lot of fun with it.

1

kennyh90 t1_jacarjn wrote

In comparison to the original and quality of the re2 remake they really did a not great job, there was fun there but it felt very on rails

1

Manjorno316 t1_jacb0mr wrote

Yeah RE2R was better but RE3R isn't worse just because there is a better game out there.

By itself it's still a good game. Just not as great as RE2R was. It was a good game imo at least.

1

kennyh90 t1_jacb9vi wrote

Imagine a Mr x style nemesis who hounds you through the city, not just at random events

Imagine If they kept the majority of locations that were cut from the game

It really did feel like a dlc, be that the case I wouldn’t have had an issue with it…for a dlc

1

Slaven-N t1_jacbtb7 wrote

Cant arque with that. Nemesis encounters where far more tense in original game and not to mention in RE3 remake nemesis was just ok. Not to mention to many Not my final form situations did not gave it any good.

1

kennyh90 t1_jacc76q wrote

Exactly! Nemesis didn’t have that many forms in the original yet every encounter in the remake something was new without too much explanation, at least his mutations in the original were wound healing

I’ll say Carlos was better written in the remake but overall I definitely prefer the original even today

1

Slaven-N t1_jacchnf wrote

Oh no doubt. Originals are originals. All original RE games are dear to me. Especialy the older ones. Where camera does not folow you but its fixed camera angles.

1