t3rmina1 t1_j42ht55 wrote
Reply to comment by Neo_Techni in Self-driving stroller aims to reduce parents’ stress – at cost of £2,700 by diacewrb
>The stroller is packed with sensors, motors and AI and is capable of driving itself when empty, keeping up with parents while they hold their infants and stopping automatically if it goes out of reach or encounters an obstacle.
>Electric motors also aid when manually pushing the 13.6kg stroller, similar to an e-bike, assisting with inclines and automatically braking when going downhill
It doesn't navigate by itself when you've got a baby in it. But of course, you're incapable of reading more than a title
Neo_Techni t1_j42kom4 wrote
> It doesn't navigate by itself when you've got a baby in it
That makes it pretty useless
> But of course, you're incapable of reading more than a title
If the title is inaccurate, blame the person who wrote it. It's meant to convey all relevant data. Though your rudeness is not required.
t3rmina1 t1_j42luyb wrote
Says the person who said the buyer should receive a Darwin award.
And let's say it could drive with the baby in it, why not say: anyone who buys a self-driving car should also receive a Darwin award
But, rather than checking if it was possible, you jumped straight to conclusions like it was an Olympic sport.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments