Submitted by SalmonellaTizz t3_ya0sn9 in gadgets
Winjin t1_it9661u wrote
Reply to comment by Knuddelbearli in 8K Industry Faces Challenge with New EU Regulatory Ruling by SalmonellaTizz
Yeah not too mention that most people (like 90%?) are probably watching compressed videos that are barely real full HD.
Like I remember thinking whether I need 4K to watch movies... And then I reminded myself that I have dirt cheap wifi and watch everything in compressed 720p.
danielv123 t1_it9r180 wrote
YouTube has done the testing and it turns out most people are fine with 360p somehow.
ThePu55yDestr0yr t1_ita2bkk wrote
Tbf majority demographics of YouTube are like:
-
Half probably bot net inflating viewers, astro turfing or annoying content creators
-
children who don’t care for HD cus they don’t know how to press buttons on their iPhone or TV, or mindlessly auto-playing watching kid shows or some dumb content creators
-
Everyone else, fifth or quarter of “everyone else” are probably vision impaired or old people where hd may not matter.
Also music vid viewers who don’t give a shit about video quality replaying over and over.
HD demographics are gonna be the minority when, need good internet (or patience), and don’t fall into above categories.
Personally I prefer HD vids but no way I can tolerate video buffering and shit ads on trash connection
TheThiefMaster t1_itb14g7 wrote
If you have a phone in portrait mode you probably don't have many more pixels than that for a video.
I've done it a few times scrolling comments while the video played.
TheBigFeIIa t1_it9vf3l wrote
Hardly surprising given decades of fuzzy analog TV
mileswilliams t1_it9qt7y wrote
First thing I ever watched in HD was South Park.
Knuddelbearli t1_itb8i6e wrote
Yes, anime/animation and porn is where I'm most likely to notice a difference on my TV. But still, FHD ( on 42 inches, with 65+ then eventually 4k) is actually enough for me, I prefer better colours / black levels.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments