Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

bajo2292 t1_irf2ugt wrote

What’s the sience behind this ?

I mean ELI5 sience

9

Sennema t1_irf616x wrote

Brought to you by Theranos

55

Sirisian t1_irfidkr wrote

Replying to bajo2292 (#52,489)

It's mentioned in the article:

> The software works by analyzing the web of blood vessels contained within the retina of the eye. It measures the total area covered by these arteries and veins, as well as their width and “tortuosity” (how bendy they are). All these factors are affected by an individual’s heart health, allowing the software to make predictions about a subject’s risk from heart disease just by looking at a non-invasive snapshot of their eye.

It's also mentioned their dataset is skewed toward UK demographics so they'll need more data to cover a wider population.

15

rickg t1_irfkmui wrote

Replying to Sirisian (#53,102)

If they want to PREDICT they'll need to scan an otherwise healthy person without heart disease and then give odds on that person developing heart issues. Otherwise they're not predicting risk, they're diagnosing current health.

3

Sirisian t1_irfm6ho wrote

Replying to rickg (#53,198)

Not necessarily. A lot of health complications start as subtle symptoms that grow. With enough independent data it's possible to extrapolate current blood vessel configurations with future states. That is even though a lot of samples are different people there's a transition from "good" to "bad" states that should be detectable at certain points. Just reading the current health might be enough to determine if one is on the slope toward bad health by identifying features in the blood vessels that aren't in healthy sample.

Being able to do very detailed scans like they are seems to give them this level of features to make these predictions. That said you're probably right. Having scans over time from the same individuals would probably help even more with seeing any good/bad transitions.

3

Unc13B1u3 t1_irfq7cm wrote

And the app will only cost 10000$

2

Jatzy_AME t1_irfyty0 wrote

Replying to Sirisian (#53,274)

Doesn't matter. If they want to train the algo to detect early signs, they need longitudinal data (image of retina long enough before potential diagnosis). Collecting such data will take time, by definition, so they won't be able to extend to wider population soon. In any case, I'd be very careful with claims of AI diagnoses. There are many many ways to hide bs in these project.

−3

brademerika t1_irgm8eo wrote

I could look in your eye and predict your chance of heart disease too.

1

atomiku121 t1_irh3rgm wrote

I can look into your eye and predict your risk of heart disease in 5 seconds or less. The time frame is not the interesting thing here, but rather the accuracy.

8

terracottatilefish t1_irhdk72 wrote

Replying to bajo2292 (#52,489)

the small vessels in the retina do show signs of cardiovascular disease earlier than many of the bigger vessels. Optometrists and ophthalmologists are trained to look for “copper wiring” and “silver wiring” and tortuousity, and a lot of medical centers will do “tele-ophthalmology” for screening retinal exams for diabetic patients where a tech will take a picture of the back of your eye and an ophthalmologist will review it later.

The advantage of this software is presumably that the algorithm will be able to pick up subtle signs and translate it into a predictive model for heart disease, and to do it more quickly/practically than having an ophthalmologist review every image.

2

GeorgeKaplanIsReal t1_irikx38 wrote

And with just one drop of blood we’ll be able to run every test imaginable.

1

No-Okra-2924 t1_irj41cb wrote

I find it extremely frustrating to read these technology articles just to find out I can’t test or see it for myself. I’d be very interested in getting a scan like this.

2