Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ScienceIsSexy420 t1_j6p156q wrote

Reply to comment by Algur in ELI5: What is the point of Christian Colleges?? by C_Wisn

Did you mean to quote me with no text of your own?

1

Algur t1_j6p29ok wrote

Yes. Although if it wasn't clear I can go back and bold a few words for you.

1

ScienceIsSexy420 t1_j6p4ab2 wrote

So what that means is that any reason is valid except for the protected reasons. This was contrary to what the person I responded to was saying, which is why I phrased it that way. I'm sorry if you found this confusing or contradictory, but it wasn't meant to be.

1

Algur t1_j6p5q21 wrote

> So what that means is that any reason is valid except for the protected reasons.

Correct.

>This was contrary to what the person I responded to was saying, which is why I phrased it that way.

Incorrect. This is in agreement with the person you responded to. It’s contrary to your initial comment.

The issue here is that you made an incorrect statement, were then corrected, then proceeded to say that your initial statement was correct while at the same time agreeing with the correction.

1

ScienceIsSexy420 t1_j6p6j5p wrote

I genuinely thought my initial comment mentioned the protected situations, my apologies.

1