Submitted by lloyd705 t3_10m2taw in explainlikeimfive
alexmin93 t1_j63oa6m wrote
Reply to comment by deaconsc in ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
So you believe putin's tales about his nuclear Wunderwaffe? With or without nukes, russia loses VS NATO in any scenaro. US has a better alternative to any conventional AND nuclear weapon russia can field.
steruY t1_j63pts9 wrote
If you're naive enough to believe none of thousands of nukes in Putin's hands work, then you're really leaving in a bubble. "A better alternative" doesn't matter as a single nuke detonating is already millions of deaths.
alexmin93 t1_j63rp6f wrote
Ofc they have working nukes. The thing is - NATO has more and better nukes.
steruY t1_j63t9qa wrote
Well, that's not exactly the means of defense we're talking about. But ok, anyway, I stopped worrying
alexmin93 t1_j63vh0b wrote
NATO has better missile defense as well. It can't intercept all or even majority of russian nukes but it shifts balance in NATO balance even more
steruY t1_j6416b7 wrote
>all or even majority of russian nukes
...which means a wipeout of dozens of millions of people still. No need for nukes to be dropped ether way.
[deleted] t1_j6526aj wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments