Submitted by night_trotter t3_10jec9x in explainlikeimfive
TactlessTortoise t1_j5jzuw2 wrote
According to the article itself, their experiment seems to be bogus, not much unlike me electrocuting myself on a power outlet and claiming to be a lightning wizard.
What they did was entangle two qubits the same way as always, and then touched the little guys on it to "pair them up" like some sort of quantum bluetooth.
UntangledQubit t1_j5kjyz0 wrote
This high level description isn't fundamentally different to how you would actually entangle macroscopic objects. We know how to create microscopic superposition states, and we know that entanglement spreads by interaction. That's the point of the Schroedinger's cat experiment - the decaying atom interacts with the cat through the detector+poison vial, and this interaction entangles them, putting both in a very distinct superposition of vastly different states (decayed and not decayed, and dead and not dead).
The question here is whether the tardigrades were meaningfully entangled with the qubit states by this specific interaction (acting as a dielectric on capacitors within the quantum system). The skeptics say that the interaction of the tardigrades with the actual qubit states is so weak, there is effectively no correlation between the two.
TactlessTortoise t1_j5kl44o wrote
Yes, I didn't mean that the idea in itself was bogus, but they had no way to actually validate that anything happened.
slinger301 t1_j5lw6bd wrote
Personally, I was getting Star Trek: Discovery vibes here.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments