Think about what dividing means with a concrete example.
Let's say you have 4 apples and want to divide those into 2 piles. So that's 4 divided by 2. You get 2 piles of 2 apples each right?
Great. Now take that same pile of 4 apples and divide it into zero piles. You can't do it, can you? No matter what you do, you're left with some number of piles of apples. Short of making the apples cease to exist, you can't divide them into zero piles, hence you can't divide by zero.
It gets more complicated to use the apple example when you get into negative numbers and such, but this is a straight-forward example for ELI5.
You can also think of it in reverse. 2x2=4. You have a pile of two apples twice, which makes four apples. How many piles of zero apples would you need to get four apples?
Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):
ELI5 requires that you search the ELI5 subreddit for your topic before posting.
Users will often either find a thread that meets their needs or find that their question might qualify for an exception to rule 7.
Please see this wiki entry for more details (Rule 7).
If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.
So if you take 10 items and put them in 2 groups, you have 5 items per group. (10÷2=5)
If you take 10 items and put them in 1 group, you have 10 items. (10÷1=10)
If you take 0 items and put them in 100 groups, you have 0 items per group. (0÷100=0)
But there is no way to put 10 items in 0 groups, you still have 10 items, so it wouldn't be zero, but they're not grouped at all so it's not a number (like 10), so you get 10÷0 is invalid or null.
Etc. The closer you get to dividing by 0, the closer your answer tends towards infinity (and negative infinity if you come from the negative direction.)
So why would you arbitrarily define 1/0 to be 0? It doesn't give you any extra predictive power. It doesn't really lead to much, and you still have to leave it out in any situation where you're not defining it. It's just not a very useful definition.
Simply put, Divide by zero is actually infinity. Although, mathmatically it cannot be solved (leading to calculators giving Div-by-zero error)
You're about to get a crash-course in limits.
Mentally, This can be thought of as taking any number and dividing it by smaller and smaller numbers. The smaller the divide-by number is, the more MASSIVE the answer. If you divide by the smallest number possible (Ten, divided by 0.00(...)01 with nearly infinite zeros, but still 1 at the end, you'll get a nearlyInfinite number). basically infinite
Defiant63 t1_j6k64ah wrote
Think about what dividing means with a concrete example.
Let's say you have 4 apples and want to divide those into 2 piles. So that's 4 divided by 2. You get 2 piles of 2 apples each right?
Great. Now take that same pile of 4 apples and divide it into zero piles. You can't do it, can you? No matter what you do, you're left with some number of piles of apples. Short of making the apples cease to exist, you can't divide them into zero piles, hence you can't divide by zero.
It gets more complicated to use the apple example when you get into negative numbers and such, but this is a straight-forward example for ELI5.