Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_j2c62af wrote

This should be explained in depth, but simply, the fact that we should understand is; mind is not a physical part or organ and it's not located at a specific place or part of the brain. But brain involves to proceed the mind...

−5

noonemustknowmysecre t1_j2czswz wrote

...eh, that's like saying that software doesn't physically exist.

But it does. The pattern in the RAM and CPU is a real electrical charge and has real physical manifestation. Same with the pattern of connections, electrochemical signals, and hormones in the head.

Lemme make that clear. You're claiming something exists, but doesn't physically exist, like it exists outside of physics or something. It's bullshit.

4

[deleted] t1_j2da9x9 wrote

Yes, you are right. That's what I'm trying to tell in a simple way. And I haven't said that there isn't a thing like mind. I just said don't try to see it in a physical way...like your software example, it does not physically exist but it involves with other physical parts and it's an essential thing to function properly. Same matter for mind.

−1

noonemustknowmysecre t1_j2fk38a wrote

Huh? You can't say I'm right and then double down on being wrong.

Software DOES physically exist. I just explained how and where.

2

Cryzgnik t1_j2d8lpm wrote

>the fact that we should understand is; mind is not a physical part or organ and it's not located at a specific place or part of the brain.

That's not a fact, that's one philosophical argument that is not definitive in the philosophy of mind and body.

3

[deleted] t1_j2d9tve wrote

Yes, you are right. It is an argument in philosophy. But there are long and deep explanations in Buddhism. Please, refer them...

0