Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

homeboi808 t1_j2a8dpo wrote

It would make more sense to state what % battery loss is used per hour or city/highway driving, or total time you can drive for city/highway.

The Leaf advertising 121 MPG means nothing, as I don’t know how many “gallons” a full charge has. My car advertises like 36 MPG city, and with a 12gal tank I know I can drive ~430 miles.

−1

jaa101 t1_j2bp9ms wrote

This is a great point. If they're going to quote miles per gallon as a fuel efficiency figure then they also need to prominently display the battery capacity in gallons. Multiplying the two numbers should give you the range in miles.

At some point it will make sense to change to kW-hours but not while the great majority of cars still run on gas. It's the same with light bulbs where people know how bright a 60W incandescent bulb is but still don't know that that's about 800 lumens. Some LED bulbs are marketed with incandescent-equivalent wattage more prominent that actual wattage.

1

gabmasterjcc t1_j2e8af7 wrote

You are conflating range (time or distance) vs efficiency. First, % battery loss per time would be an unnecessarily complex metric, you would just put the time. That does not tell you how efficient the car is as battery size is not held steady. In terms of a gas car, a Hummer could have a longer time until you need to fill up, but it is obviously not as efficient as a Prius. MPGe while not necessarily the best metric, does provide an efficency metric. It also has a rough correlation to the MPG metric used for years in the US.

1