Submitted by odyssey92 t3_zwkc6e in explainlikeimfive
ConstantThanks t1_j1v7n7i wrote
Reply to comment by CFDietCoke in ELI5 what would energy from nuclear fusion mean for humanity? by odyssey92
saying they are zero carbon footprint is not true. you have to factor in the mining of resources, building of the physical power plants, huge amounts of cement and steel, etc., backup power sources, all of the vehicles and other fossil fuel related activity used in maintenance, operation, construction, waste 'disposal,' etc. the only part of the process that's carbon neutral is the part that proponents of nuclear like to think about; the f(us,iss)ion.
CFDietCoke t1_j1v8eol wrote
> saying they are zero carbon footprint is not true
Fair point. I was specifically focusing on the reaction, but your point is a god one. However, the carbon footprint of building a reactor of any type can't really be avoided.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments