Submitted by mwclarkson t3_z8rtxi in explainlikeimfive
Inevitable_Thing_270 t1_iydbxdh wrote
It’s a bit of both and other things.
You’re supposed to be able to identify a pill from its appearance. This can be done by a combination of colour, shape, size and symbols imprinted on it or something printed on the side of a capsule. At an individual person level it means that if you’re taking more than one type of pill at a time and pop them into your hand, you can see that you have the number and type you expect. At a bigger level, random pills could potentially be identified from a database
You’ve then got other things like the active drug. 1g of paracetamol is a standard dose for an adult, so you can’t go smaller than the volume of that amount. But you then have to add in any preservatives, binders etc needed
Generally you want tasteless, but it’s not always possible, even with pills. There might be a constituent of that has a horrible flavour so a nicer flavour is put in to mask it (eg in liquid drugs for kids). Other times there will be something that tastes horrendous and there’s no chance of covering it (eg 5mg soluble prednisolone tablets taste horrendous even if swallowed whole and seems it can’t be covered). Then you have a coating that might be needed. Some pills will need to release their contents after they’ve left the stomach and are in the intestines, so need a different coating than a simple water soluble one, and it might have a butter or sweet taste.
Colour is another thing. There’s a fair amount of research about the placebo effect of the colour of the pill. Such as yellow or red pills seeming to have a stimulant effect and blue pills are sedatives. This is with placebos. So if you are making a pill, it makes a bit of sense to match its colour to this research. But many manufacturers don’t do this, so it’s not taken into consideration often
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments