Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Seeker_Of_Knowledge- t1_iuha9fl wrote

The inconsistency man. You said "we don't know why" and then in the next second you said "it is partly genetic luck".

−3

Upper-Wolf6040 t1_iuhi5hu wrote

He said "we don't really know why every time, Its partly genetic luck".

The key words are "every time" and "partly"

1

Seeker_Of_Knowledge- t1_iuhii99 wrote

And this is exactly why I said inconsistency.

If it one time a genetic and the other time it is not genetic. Then it is clearly shouldn't be taken as a reliable data. Hell, it shouldn't be even taken as assumption.

1

ixramuffin t1_iuhkhrj wrote

Medicine deals with averages. We rarely know what is happening to individuals. Saying that "something is partly genetic" and "we don't know why every time" are not exclusive at all. On average, genetics has an influence. We just usually don't know "when" and "for whom".

2

Seeker_Of_Knowledge- t1_iuk2tv5 wrote

Oh I see the point. Thanks, it now make sense.

Medicine deals with averages is super interesting concept I haven't thought about before.

1

Upper-Wolf6040 t1_iuhjf61 wrote

That still doesn't make sense. They're not saying one time is genetic and the other time is not genetic. I think youre misinterpreting what they're saying.

0

rasa2013 t1_iuieeeb wrote

That's an interesting interpretation. Genetics plays a role, but we don't know the specifics. We just know it's involved. Ergo, we don't really know why.

1