Submitted by SovietCyka756 t3_ygqtg5 in explainlikeimfive
senorali t1_iua82a1 wrote
Reply to comment by Antman013 in eli5: What are freemasons and why are there so many conspiracies about them? by SovietCyka756
Social media has given people the ability to do this without geographical limitations. Clubs aren't dead, they just migrated to the digital world.
Antman013 t1_iuagc50 wrote
While the online world can provide the same sense of fellowship, the membership is much less diverse than the groups mentioned. One need only look at certain sub-reddits for proof. The benefit to the community at large of these sorts of groups is what I was getting at earlier.
senorali t1_iuaxk20 wrote
It's the exact opposite in my opinion. Online groups have the potential to be far more diverse, whereas the masons are predominantly old white men.
Antman013 t1_iubdk7c wrote
We clearly hang our in different subs. Most subs I frequent that have even a tangential relationship to politics (r/Toronto, for example, though I have left it) skew young and socialist.
Even a lot of "sports" related subs go that route.
​
This could just be a function of the internet itself, but it IS there. Also, while my Lodge had it's share of "old white guys", we were actually fairly diverse (unsurprising, given the demographics of my home town).
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments