OrbitalPete t1_je8xuhg wrote
There is a linear correlation, but the origin is not at 0.
https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-7df15e6faf5f599060c6884fc88d39d7-pjlq
Both scales have a constant linearity to them, and 1 degree Celsius increase is always a 1.8 degree Farenheit increase.
This graph plots one against the other, as you can see showing a linear correlation. https://d1uvxqwmcz8fl1.cloudfront.net/tes/resources/11829524/ff0efc69-c7a4-4963-ba86-c733ac6602a3/image?width=500&height=500&version=1541452521288
Jkei t1_je8y9uq wrote
This is a very nice example.
You can also tell from the conversion formula (which is the formula behind that graph, too) that the relationship is linear. Namely...
>F = 1.8 * C + 32 (or C = 5/9 * F - 32)
...is a classic a * x + b linear formula.
E: switched F and C originally.
Gregib t1_je9ac0g wrote
>C = 1.8 * F + 32
Actually, it's F = 1.8 * C + 32
westbamm t1_je9ay7a wrote
Cool, now I am confused.
Jkei t1_je9tpwt wrote
I described the conversion of celsius to fahrenheit but accidentally flipped the F and C in the formula. It's corrected now, and I added the opposite conversion for good measure.
Jkei t1_je9ewpa wrote
Oh yes, I switched them up. Lemme fix that.
Moewillgo OP t1_je8y0lp wrote
I think I get it now, thank you (:
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments