Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

icelandichorsey t1_ja9ph4l wrote

Reply to comment by DressCritical in Eli5: How did people know how long a year was in olden times? by Slokkkk

Except the time to do and the means to do it and have the patience and the scientific method which is not actually that old.

−3

DressCritical t1_jaa8p1a wrote

Wanna bet?

Karahan Tepe, Turkey, the oldest known ancient site accurately aligned to the winter solstice is over 11,000 years old.

There is a site in Aberdeenshire, Scotland, with a lunar calendar that used the solstice to keep on track that is about 10,000 years old, though it is not nearly so sophisticated.

There are a number of sites in Great Britain, Mesopotamia, and at least one in Germany aligned with the solstice which are as old or older than the pyramids.

The ancient Egyptians tracked more than 4,000 astronomical events. There are a number of examples of ancient calendars and structures that were aligned with the solstice created by the Egyptians, such as the Sphinx.

Heard of Stonehenge? Tracked quite a bit more than the winter solstice. Not that old considering it appears to be 7,000 years younger than the oldest known example.

If going by technology rather than age, then in the New World, we have Machu Picchu, Chichen Itza, Chaco Canyon, and quite a few others.

Scientific method? Not required. Not even close. Not even Neolithic. Mesolithic. Some of these structures were built prior to the most recent period of the Stone Age.

4

icelandichorsey t1_jabmyvt wrote

Fair enough, thanks

Your original comment sounded like taking our current world (or even the world of the last 500 years) for granted. A world where enough people have the time to sit around and measure things like this and make accurate enough conclusions and then also be able to influence the hierarchy enough to make it into a "calendar".

Also they would have had to stay in one place rather than migrate long enough, again, we're talking this for granted. That's no small thing although I didn't consider organised religion who of course tick all of these boxes and have been around for thousands of years.

Anyway, your subsequent response clarified that you weren't thinking like this. Thanks

1

annomandaris t1_jaarnci wrote

lol, you don't need the scientific method to count 13 lunar months, 28 days, 364 days in a year. and then after a few years you would realize that your days are off a little. After a few resets, it wouldn't be hard to realize that 1 day every 4 years keeps it on track.

This would have been known and kept track of so long ago, 50K? maybe 100K years ago. They didn't have writing tools but they had pretty sophisticated markings on sticks and stuff.

1

AliMcGraw t1_jabbit3 wrote

Also deadass giveaway that someone is a man who doesn't know much about women and generally lacks curiosity about the world when it doesn't occur to them that a lunar cycle would be of INTENSE INTEREST and OBVIOUS USE to the 50% of humans who menstruate on roughly a lunar cycle.

"Well, I don't need to know the lunar cycle, so I don't see why ANYONE would," u/icelandichorsey harrumpfs to himself, before explaining to the woman unfortunate enough to sit next to him on public transit how science works, actually.

1

im_the_real_dad t1_jaciaaf wrote

So you're saying that the lunar cycle appears to be 23 days long to some women and it appears to be 33 days long to other women and to still other women the moon goes through the lunar cycle in some number of days in between?

1

icelandichorsey t1_jabmwj2 wrote

I'm sorry, what the actual fuck? How did you get there from my 2 lines about the scientific method? You know literally nothing abjht me. Projecting much?

−1

Erablian t1_jabcrc5 wrote

The synodic month averages 29.53 days, quite a bit different from your 28-day month. After 13 of those, your calendar would be 9.6 days out of sync with the actual phase of the moon.

13 synodic months is about 384 days, not 364.

1