Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Adversement t1_j9pl3sw wrote

Any source for actual difference in offered protection design? (There are helmets approved for both, given that the actual test requirements for the head protection are nearly identical. To project with the impact from about head-height to the solid ground below. That is, a fall.)

The cooling of the head, or keeping it warm, is the obvious difference in design. Most bike helmets are perforated nearly to oblivion resulting in very lightweight helmets. The helmets that suit both for both are too warm for sportive cycling, work decently for leisurely commuting with an upright bicycle, and excel as a winter helmet for such cycling.

0

Whydun t1_j9qtow6 wrote

The proof is in looking at the thing. Bike helmets offer a much reduced rear of head coverage. Test requirements such as what you mention just cover testing the materials for impact durability, not the impact locations.

2