Final-Rush759 t1_izp316u wrote
It's not false positive. The models were trained with pictures, not far from cartoons. I think models performed really well.
abhijit1247 OP t1_izp78pp wrote
I think so these models were trained with real human faces (eg.- http://shuoyang1213.me/WIDERFACE/) and not cartoon faces. So, the example that I have shown would be a false positive.
CauseSigns t1_izp90t9 wrote
Unless a model claims to detect only non-cartoon faces, it’s not a false positive. A face is a face
abhijit1247 OP t1_izqxfer wrote
Due to lack of details of cartoon faces, the model should not detect these cartoon faces as faces with a high confidence score (about 86.8 %). If this is the case then these models are as bad as haar cascade based face detectors.
mr_birrd t1_izpew7e wrote
that's not how it actually learns and it's a good thing, would be complete overfit if it only gives true positives for the exact images it saw in training.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments