Submitted by ThoughtOk5558 t3_xvcman in deeplearning
XecutionStyle t1_ir20qoc wrote
Reply to comment by saw79 in A wild question? Why CNNs are not aware of visual quality? [D] by ThoughtOk5558
I don't think it's nebulous. We infuse knowledge, bias, prior etc. like physics (in Lagrangian networks) all the time. I was just addressing his last point. There's no analytical solution for quality we can use as labels.
Networks can understand the difference between pretty and ugly semantically with tons of data, and tons of data only.
saw79 t1_ir23cl5 wrote
All I meant by nebulous was that he didn't have a concrete idea for what to actually use as visual quality, and you've nicely described how it's actually a very deep inference that we as humans make with our relatively advanced brains.
I did not mean that it it's conceptually something that can't exist. I think we're very much in agreement.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments