Instead of repeated spamming of your "blog" with its low effort posts, perhaps you could simply point to the Reuters article that you plagiarized (regurgitated), or even better, the original article that is referenced in that one.
Yes, but he left because it was a conflict of interest for Tesla (also says so in the article). I would assume he intends to create a Tesla subsidiary now or get rid of Trsla stock altogether (which would likely kill the company at this point, so it's unlikely).
That's simply not true. Musk is not a open source or public domain advocate. He is a profit-driven entrepreneur.
His current ambitions to create a OpenAI alternative is not for open source or public domain, it's to counter the leftist agenda (coincidentally also racist and sexist) that OpenAI has been pushing with their latest products, as he has multiple times in the past proclaimed he is politically neutral, antipolitical/anti-establishment and expressed views that could be understood as conservative.
Obviously, he counts on it being profitable, as OpenAI has demonstrated. The question only is - how does he do this without entering a conflict of interest with Tesla, which is mostly an AI company itself?
It's not much different from the reason he provided for buying Twitter (other than being forced to), which is countering Twitters control of the narrative into one that stifles conservative views and promotes liberal ones.
Well that guy is always talking about how much he wants to do stuff, who tf cares? With his money I'd also like to get into anything people talk about i guess
DJStillAlive t1_jac8pvj wrote
Instead of repeated spamming of your "blog" with its low effort posts, perhaps you could simply point to the Reuters article that you plagiarized (regurgitated), or even better, the original article that is referenced in that one.